Spock Framework Reference Documentation

Introduction

Spock is a testing and specification framework for Java and Groovy applications. What makes it stand out from the crowd is its beautiful and highly expressive specification language. Thanks to its JUnit runner, Spock is compatible with most IDEs, build tools, and continuous integration servers. Spock is inspired from JUnit, jMock, RSpec, Groovy, Scala, Vulcans, and other fascinating life forms.

Getting Started

It’s really easy to get started with Spock. This section shows you how.

Spock Web Console

Spock Web Console is a website that allows you to instantly view, edit, run, and even publish Spock specifications. It is the perfect place to toy around with Spock without making any commitments. So why not run Hello, Spock! right away?

Spock Example Project

To try Spock in your local environment, clone or download/unzip the Spock Example Project. It comes with fully working Ant, Gradle, and Maven builds that require no further setup. The Gradle build even bootstraps Gradle itself and gets you up and running in Eclipse or IDEA with a single command. See the README for detailed instructions.

Spock Primer

This chapter assumes that you have a basic knowledge of Groovy and unit testing. If you are a Java developer but haven’t heard about Groovy, don’t worry - Groovy will feel very familiar to you! In fact, one of Groovy’s main design goals is to be the scripting language alongside Java. So just follow along and consult the Groovy documentation whenever you feel like it.

The goals of this chapter are to teach you enough Spock to write real-world Spock specifications, and to whet your appetite for more.

To learn more about Groovy, go to https://groovy-lang.org/.

To learn more about unit testing, go to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_testing.

Terminology

Let’s start with a few definitions: Spock lets you write specifications that describe expected features (properties, aspects) exhibited by a system of interest. The system of interest could be anything between a single class and a whole application, and is also called the system under specification or SUS. The description of a feature starts from a specific snapshot of the SUS and its collaborators; this snapshot is called the feature’s fixture.

The following sections walk you through all building blocks of which a Spock specification may be composed. A typical specification uses only a subset of them.

Imports

import spock.lang.*

Package spock.lang contains the most important types for writing specifications.

Specification

class MyFirstSpecification extends Specification {
  // fields
  // fixture methods
  // feature methods
  // helper methods
}

A specification is represented as a Groovy class that extends from spock.lang.Specification. The name of a specification usually relates to the system or system operation described by the specification. For example, CustomerSpec, H264VideoPlayback, and ASpaceshipAttackedFromTwoSides are all reasonable names for a specification.

Class Specification contains a number of useful methods for writing specifications. Furthermore it instructs JUnit to run specification with Sputnik, Spock’s JUnit runner. Thanks to Sputnik, Spock specifications can be run by most modern Java IDEs and build tools.

Fields

def obj = new ClassUnderSpecification()
def coll = new Collaborator()

Instance fields are a good place to store objects belonging to the specification’s fixture. It is good practice to initialize them right at the point of declaration. (Semantically, this is equivalent to initializing them at the very beginning of the setup() method.) Objects stored into instance fields are not shared between feature methods. Instead, every feature method gets its own object. This helps to isolate feature methods from each other, which is often a desirable goal.

@Shared res = new VeryExpensiveResource()

Sometimes you need to share an object between feature methods. For example, the object might be very expensive to create, or you might want your feature methods to interact with each other. To achieve this, declare a @Shared field. Again it’s best to initialize the field right at the point of declaration. (Semantically, this is equivalent to initializing the field at the very beginning of the setupSpec() method.)

static final PI = 3.141592654

Static fields should only be used for constants. Otherwise shared fields are preferable, because their semantics with respect to sharing are more well-defined.

Fixture Methods

def setupSpec() {}    // runs once -  before the first feature method
def setup() {}        // runs before every feature method
def cleanup() {}      // runs after every feature method
def cleanupSpec() {}  // runs once -  after the last feature method

Fixture methods are responsible for setting up and cleaning up the environment in which feature methods are run. Usually it’s a good idea to use a fresh fixture for every feature method, which is what the setup() and cleanup() methods are for.

All fixture methods are optional.

Occasionally it makes sense for feature methods to share a fixture, which is achieved by using shared fields together with the setupSpec() and cleanupSpec() methods. Note that setupSpec() and cleanupSpec() may not reference instance fields unless they are annotated with @Shared.

Invocation Order

If fixture methods are overridden in a specification subclass then setup() of the superclass will run before setup() of the subclass. cleanup() works in reverse order, that is cleanup() of the subclass will execute before cleanup() of the superclass. setupSpec() and cleanupSpec() behave in the same way. There is no need to explicitly call super.setup() or super.cleanup() as Spock will automatically find and execute fixture methods at all levels in an inheritance hierarchy.

super.setupSpec
sub.setupSpec
super.setup
sub.setup
feature method
sub.cleanup
super.cleanup
sub.cleanupSpec
super.cleanupSpec

Feature Methods

def "pushing an element on the stack"() {
  // blocks go here
}

Feature methods are the heart of a specification. They describe the features (properties, aspects) that you expect to find in the system under specification. By convention, feature methods are named with String literals. Try to choose good names for your feature methods, and feel free to use any characters you like!

Conceptually, a feature method consists of four phases:

Set up the feature’s fixture
Provide a stimulus to the system under specification
Describe the response expected from the system
Clean up the feature’s fixture

Whereas the first and last phases are optional, the stimulus and response phases are always present (except in interacting feature methods), and may occur more than once.

Blocks

Spock has built-in support for implementing each of the conceptual phases of a feature method. To this end, feature methods are structured into so-called blocks. Blocks start with a label, and extend to the beginning of the next block, or the end of the method. There are six kinds of blocks: given, when, then, expect, cleanup, and where blocks. Any statements between the beginning of the method and the first explicit block belong to an implicit given block.

A feature method must have at least one explicit (i.e. labelled) block - in fact, the presence of an explicit block is what makes a method a feature method. Blocks divide a method into distinct sections, and cannot be nested.

The picture on the right shows how blocks map to the conceptual phases of a feature method. The where block has a special role, which will be revealed shortly. But first, let’s have a closer look at the other blocks.

Given Blocks

given:
def stack = new Stack()
def elem = "push me"

The given block is where you do any setup work for the feature that you are describing. It may not be preceded by other blocks, and may not be repeated. A given block doesn’t have any special semantics. The given: label is optional and may be omitted, resulting in an implicit given block. Originally, the alias setup: was the preferred block name, but using given: often leads to a more readable feature method description (see Specifications as Documentation).

When and Then Blocks

when:   // stimulus
then:   // response

The when and then blocks always occur together. They describe a stimulus and the expected response. Whereas when blocks may contain arbitrary code, then blocks are restricted to conditions, exception conditions, interactions, and variable definitions. A feature method may contain multiple pairs of when-then blocks.

Conditions

Conditions describe an expected state, much like JUnit’s assertions. However, conditions are written as plain boolean expressions, eliminating the need for an assertion API. (More precisely, a condition may also produce a non-boolean value, which will then be evaluated according to Groovy truth.) Let’s see some conditions in action:

when:
stack.push(elem)

then:
!stack.empty
stack.size() == 1
stack.peek() == elem

Tip

Try to keep the number of conditions per feature method small. One to five conditions is a good guideline. If you have more than that, ask yourself if you are specifying multiple unrelated features at once. If the answer is yes, break up the feature method in several smaller ones. If your conditions only differ in their values, consider using a data table.

What kind of feedback does Spock provide if a condition is violated? Let’s try and change the second condition to stack.size() == 2. Here is what we get:

Condition not satisfied:

stack.size() == 2
|     |      |
|     1      false
[push me]

As you can see, Spock captures all values produced during the evaluation of a condition, and presents them in an easily digestible form. Nice, isn’t it?

Implicit and explicit conditions

Conditions are an essential ingredient of then blocks and expect blocks. Except for calls to void methods and expressions classified as interactions, all top-level expressions in these blocks are implicitly treated as conditions. To use conditions in other places, you need to designate them with Groovy’s assert keyword:

def setup() {
  stack = new Stack()
  assert stack.empty
}

If an explicit condition is violated, it will produce the same nice diagnostic message as an implicit condition.

Exception Conditions

Exception conditions are used to describe that a when block should throw an exception. They are defined using the thrown() method, passing along the expected exception type. For example, to describe that popping from an empty stack should throw an EmptyStackException, you could write the following:

when:
stack.pop()

then:
thrown(EmptyStackException)
stack.empty

As you can see, exception conditions may be followed by other conditions (and even other blocks). This is particularly useful for specifying the expected content of an exception. To access the exception, first bind it to a variable:

when:
stack.pop()

then:
def e = thrown(EmptyStackException)
e.cause == null

Alternatively, you may use a slight variation of the above syntax:

when:
stack.pop()

then:
EmptyStackException e = thrown()
e.cause == null

This syntax has two small advantages: First, the exception variable is strongly typed, making it easier for IDEs to offer code completion. Second, the condition reads a bit more like a sentence ("then an EmptyStackException is thrown"). Note that if no exception type is passed to the thrown() method, it is inferred from the variable type on the left-hand side.

Sometimes we need to convey that an exception should not be thrown. For example, let’s try to express that a HashMap should accept a null key:

def "HashMap accepts null key"() {
  setup:
  def map = new HashMap()
  map.put(null, "elem")
}

This works but doesn’t reveal the intention of the code. Did someone just leave the building before he had finished implementing this method? After all, where are the conditions? Fortunately, we can do better:

def "HashMap accepts null key"() {
  given:
  def map = new HashMap()

  when:
  map.put(null, "elem")

  then:
  notThrown(NullPointerException)
}

By using notThrown(), we make it clear that in particular a NullPointerException should not be thrown. (As per the contract of Map.put(), this would be the right thing to do for a map that doesn’t support null keys.) However, the method will also fail if any other exception is thrown.

Interactions

Whereas conditions describe an object’s state, interactions describe how objects communicate with each other. Interactions and Interaction based testing are described in a separate chapter, so we only give a quick example here. Suppose we want to describe the flow of events from a publisher to its subscribers. Here is the code:

def "events are published to all subscribers"() {
  given:
  def subscriber1 = Mock(Subscriber)
  def subscriber2 = Mock(Subscriber)
  def publisher = new Publisher()
  publisher.add(subscriber1)
  publisher.add(subscriber2)

  when:
  publisher.fire("event")

  then:
  1 * subscriber1.receive("event")
  1 * subscriber2.receive("event")
}

Expect Blocks

An expect block is more limited than a then block in that it may only contain conditions and variable definitions. It is useful in situations where it is more natural to describe stimulus and expected response in a single expression. For example, compare the following two attempts to describe the Math.max() method:

when:
def x = Math.max(1, 2)

then:
x == 2

expect:
Math.max(1, 2) == 2

Although both snippets are semantically equivalent, the second one is clearly preferable. As a guideline, use when-then to describe methods with side effects, and expect to describe purely functional methods.

Tip	Leverage Groovy JDK methods like `any()` and `every()` to create more expressive and succinct conditions.

Cleanup Blocks

given:
def file = new File("/some/path")
file.createNewFile()

// ...

cleanup:
file.delete()

A cleanup block may only be followed by a where block, and may not be repeated. Like a cleanup method, it is used to free any resources used by a feature method, and is run even if (a previous part of) the feature method has produced an exception. As a consequence, a cleanup block must be coded defensively; in the worst case, it must gracefully handle the situation where the first statement in a feature method has thrown an exception, and all local variables still have their default values.

Tip	Groovy’s safe dereference operator (`foo?.bar()`) simplifies writing defensive code.

Object-level specifications usually don’t need a cleanup method, as the only resource they consume is memory, which is automatically reclaimed by the garbage collector. More coarse-grained specifications, however, might use a cleanup block to clean up the file system, close a database connection, or shut down a network service.

Tip	If a specification is designed in such a way that all its feature methods require the same resources, use a `cleanup()` method; otherwise, prefer `cleanup` blocks. The same trade-off applies to `setup()` methods and `given` blocks.

Where Blocks

A where block always comes last in a method, and may not be repeated. It is used to write data-driven feature methods. To give you an idea how this is done, have a look at the following example:

def "computing the maximum of two numbers"() {
  expect:
  Math.max(a, b) == c

  where:
  a << [5, 3]
  b << [1, 9]
  c << [5, 9]
}

This where block effectively creates two "versions" of the feature method: One where a is 5, b is 1, and c is 5, and another one where a is 3, b is 9, and c is 9.

Although it is declared last, the where block is evaluated before the feature method containing it runs.

The where block is further explained in the Data Driven Testing chapter.

Helper Methods

Sometimes feature methods grow large and/or contain lots of duplicated code. In such cases it can make sense to introduce one or more helper methods. Two good candidates for helper methods are setup/cleanup logic and complex conditions. Factoring out the former is straightforward, so let’s have a look at conditions:

def "offered PC matches preferred configuration"() {
  when:
  def pc = shop.buyPc()

  then:
  pc.vendor == "Sunny"
  pc.clockRate >= 2333
  pc.ram >= 4096
  pc.os == "Linux"
}

If you happen to be a computer geek, your preferred PC configuration might be very detailed, or you might want to compare offers from many different shops. Therefore, let’s factor out the conditions:

def "offered PC matches preferred configuration"() {
  when:
  def pc = shop.buyPc()

  then:
  matchesPreferredConfiguration(pc)
}

def matchesPreferredConfiguration(pc) {
  pc.vendor == "Sunny"
  && pc.clockRate >= 2333
  && pc.ram >= 4096
  && pc.os == "Linux"
}

The new helper method matchesPreferredConfiguration() consists of a single boolean expression whose result is returned. (The return keyword is optional in Groovy.) This is fine except for the way that an inadequate offer is now presented:

Condition not satisfied:

matchesPreferredConfiguration(pc)
|                             |
false                         ...

Not very helpful. Fortunately, we can do better:

void matchesPreferredConfiguration(pc) {
  assert pc.vendor == "Sunny"
  assert pc.clockRate >= 2333
  assert pc.ram >= 4096
  assert pc.os == "Linux"
}

When factoring out conditions into a helper method, two points need to be considered: First, implicit conditions must be turned into explicit conditions with the assert keyword. Second, the helper method must have return type void. Otherwise, Spock might interpret the return value as a failing condition, which is not what we want.

As expected, the improved helper method tells us exactly what’s wrong:

Condition not satisfied:

assert pc.clockRate >= 2333
       |  |         |
       |  1666      false
       ...

A final advice: Although code reuse is generally a good thing, don’t take it too far. Be aware that the use of fixture and helper methods can increase the coupling between feature methods. If you reuse too much or the wrong code, you will end up with specifications that are fragile and hard to evolve.

Using `with` for expectations

As an alternative to the above helper methods, you can use a with(target, closure) method to interact on the object being verified. This is especially useful in then and expect blocks.

def "offered PC matches preferred configuration"() {
  when:
  def pc = shop.buyPc()

  then:
  with(pc) {
    vendor == "Sunny"
    clockRate >= 2333
    ram >= 406
    os == "Linux"
  }
}

Unlike when you use helper methods, there is no need for explicit assert statements for proper error reporting.

When verifying mocks, a with statement can also cut out verbose verification statements.

def service = Mock(Service) // has start(), stop(), and doWork() methods
def app = new Application(service) // controls the lifecycle of the service

when:
app.run()

then:
with(service) {
  1 * start()
  1 * doWork()
  1 * stop()
}

Sometimes an IDE has trouble to determine the type of the target, in that case you can help out by manually specifying the target type via with(target, type, closure).

Using `verifyAll` to assert multiple expectations together

Normal expectations fail the test on the first failed assertions. Sometimes it is helpful to collect these failures before failing the test to have more information, this behavior is also known as soft assertions.

The verifyAll method can be used like with,

def "offered PC matches preferred configuration"() {
  when:
  def pc = shop.buyPc()

  then:
  verifyAll(pc) {
    vendor == "Sunny"
    clockRate >= 2333
    ram >= 406
    os == "Linux"
  }
}

or it can be used without a target.

  expect:
  verifyAll {
    2 == 2
    4 == 4
  }

Like with you can also optionally define a type hint for the IDE.

Specifications as Documentation

Well-written specifications are a valuable source of information. Especially for higher-level specifications targeting a wider audience than just developers (architects, domain experts, customers, etc.), it makes sense to provide more information in natural language than just the names of specifications and features. Therefore, Spock provides a way to attach textual descriptions to blocks:

given: "open a database connection"
// code goes here

Use the and: label to describe logically different parts of a block:

given: "open a database connection"
// code goes here

and: "seed the customer table"
// code goes here

and: "seed the product table"
// code goes here

An and: label followed by a description can be inserted at any (top-level) position of a feature method, without altering the method’s semantics.

In Behavior Driven Development, customer-facing features (called stories) are described in a given-when-then format. Spock directly supports this style of specification with the given: label:

given: "an empty bank account"
// ...

when: "the account is credited \$10"
// ...

then: "the account's balance is \$10"
// ...

Block descriptions are not only present in source code, but are also available to the Spock runtime. Planned usages of block descriptions are enhanced diagnostic messages, and textual reports that are equally understood by all stakeholders.

Extensions

As we have seen, Spock offers lots of functionality for writing specifications. However, there always comes a time when something else is needed. Therefore, Spock provides an interception-based extension mechanism. Extensions are activated by annotations called directives. Currently, Spock ships with the following directives:

`@Timeout`	Sets a timeout for execution of a feature or fixture method.
`@Ignore`	Ignores any feature method carrying this annotation.
`@IgnoreRest`	Any feature method carrying this annotation will be executed, all others will be ignored. Useful for quickly running just a single method.
`@FailsWith`	Expects a feature method to complete abruptly. `@FailsWith` has two use cases: First, to document known bugs that cannot be resolved immediately. Second, to replace exception conditions in certain corner cases where the latter cannot be used (like specifying the behavior of exception conditions). In all other cases, exception conditions are preferable.

Go to the Extensions chapter to learn how to implement your own directives and extensions.

Comparison to JUnit

Although Spock uses a different terminology, many of its concepts and features are inspired by JUnit. Here is a rough comparison:

Spock JUnit

Spock	JUnit
Specification	Test class
`setup()`	`@Before`
`cleanup()`	`@After`
`setupSpec()`	`@BeforeClass`
`cleanupSpec()`	`@AfterClass`
Feature	Test
Feature method	Test method
Data-driven feature	Theory
Condition	Assertion
Exception condition	`@Test(expected=…)`
Interaction	Mock expectation (e.g. in Mockito)

Specification

Test class

setup()

@Before

cleanup()

@After

setupSpec()

@BeforeClass

cleanupSpec()

@AfterClass

Feature

Test

Feature method

Test method

Data-driven feature

Theory

Condition

Assertion

Exception condition

@Test(expected=…)

Interaction

Mock expectation (e.g. in Mockito)

Data Driven Testing

Oftentimes, it is useful to exercise the same test code multiple times, with varying inputs and expected results. Spock’s data driven testing support makes this a first class feature.

Introduction

Suppose we want to specify the behavior of the Math.max method:

class MathSpec extends Specification {
  def "maximum of two numbers"() {
    expect:
    // exercise math method for a few different inputs
    Math.max(1, 3) == 3
    Math.max(7, 4) == 7
    Math.max(0, 0) == 0
  }
}

Although this approach is fine in simple cases like this one, it has some potential drawbacks:

Code and data are mixed and cannot easily be changed independently
Data cannot easily be auto-generated or fetched from external sources
In order to exercise the same code multiple times, it either has to be duplicated or extracted into a separate method
In case of a failure, it may not be immediately clear which inputs caused the failure
Exercising the same code multiple times does not benefit from the same isolation as executing separate methods does

Spock’s data-driven testing support tries to address these concerns. To get started, let’s refactor above code into a data-driven feature method. First, we introduce three method parameters (called data variables) that replace the hard-coded integer values:

class MathSpec extends Specification {
  def "maximum of two numbers"(int a, int b, int c) {
    expect:
    Math.max(a, b) == c
    ...
  }
}

We have finished the test logic, but still need to supply the data values to be used. This is done in a where: block, which always comes at the end of the method. In the simplest (and most common) case, the where: block holds a data table.

Data Tables

Data tables are a convenient way to exercise a feature method with a fixed set of data values:

class MathSpec extends Specification {
  def "maximum of two numbers"(int a, int b, int c) {
    expect:
    Math.max(a, b) == c

    where:
    a | b | c
    1 | 3 | 3
    7 | 4 | 7
    0 | 0 | 0
  }
}

The first line of the table, called the table header, declares the data variables. The subsequent lines, called table rows, hold the corresponding values. For each row, the feature method will get executed once; we call this an iteration of the method. If an iteration fails, the remaining iterations will nevertheless be executed. All failures will be reported.

Data tables must have at least two columns. A single-column table can be written as:

where:
a | _
1 | _
7 | _
0 | _

A sequence of two or more underscores can be used to split one wide data table into multiple narrower ones. Without this separator and without any other data variable assignment in between there is no way to have multiple data tables in one where block, the second table would just be further iterations of the first table, including the seemingly header row:

where:
a | _
1 | _
7 | _
0 | _
__

b | c
1 | 2
3 | 4
5 | 6

This is semantically exactly the same, just as one wider combined data table:

where:
a | b | c
1 | 1 | 2
7 | 3 | 4
0 | 5 | 6

The sequence of two or more underscores can be used anywhere in the where block. It will be ignored everywhere, except for in between two data tables, where it is used to separate the two data tables. This means that the separator can also be used as styling element in different ways. It can be used as separator line like shown in the last example or it can for example be used visually as top border of tables additionally to its effect of separating them:

where:
_____
a | _
1 | _
7 | _
0 | _
_____
b | c
1 | 2
3 | 4
5 | 6

Isolated Execution of Iterations

Iterations are isolated from each other in the same way as separate feature methods. Each iteration gets its own instance of the specification class, and the setup and cleanup methods will be called before and after each iteration, respectively.

Sharing of Objects between Iterations

In order to share an object between iterations, it has to be kept in a @Shared or static field.

Note	Only `@Shared` and static variables can be accessed from within a `where:` block.

Note that such objects will also be shared with other methods. There is currently no good way to share an object just between iterations of the same method. If you consider this a problem, consider putting each method into a separate spec, all of which can be kept in the same file. This achieves better isolation at the cost of some boilerplate code.

Syntactic Variations

The previous code can be tweaked in a few ways.

First, since the where: block already declares all data variables, the method parameters can be omitted.^[1]

You can also omit some parameters and specify others, for example to have them typed. The order also is not important, data variables are matched by name to the specified method parameters.

Second, inputs and expected outputs can be separated with a double pipe symbol (||) to visually set them apart.

With this, the code becomes:

class MathSpec extends Specification {
  def "maximum of two numbers"() {
    expect:
    Math.max(a, b) == c

    where:
    a | b || c
    1 | 3 || 3
    7 | 4 || 7
    0 | 0 || 0
  }
}

Alternatively to using single or double pipes you can also use any amount of semicolons to separate data columns from each other:

class MathSpec extends Specification {
  def "maximum of two numbers"() {
    expect:
    Math.max(a, b) == c

    where:
    a ; b ;; c
    1 ; 3 ;; 3
    7 ; 4 ;; 7
    0 ; 0 ;; 0
  }
}

Pipes and semicolons as data column separator can not be mixed within one table. If the column separator changes, this starts a new stand-alone data table:

class MathSpec extends Specification {
  def "maximum of two numbers"() {
    expect:
    Math.max(a, b) == c
    Math.max(d, e) == f

    where:
    a | b || c
    1 | 3 || 3
    7 | 4 || 7
    0 | 0 || 0

    d ; e ;; f
    1 ; 3 ;; 3
    7 ; 4 ;; 7
    0 ; 0 ;; 0
  }
}

Reporting of Failures

Let’s assume that our implementation of the max method has a flaw, and one of the iterations fails:

maximum of two numbers [a: 1, b: 3, c: 3, #0]   PASSED
maximum of two numbers [a: 7, b: 4, c: 7, #1]   FAILED

Condition not satisfied:

Math.max(a, b) == c
|    |   |  |  |  |
|    |   7  4  |  7
|    42        false
class java.lang.Math

maximum of two numbers [a: 0, b: 0, c: 0, #2]   PASSED

The obvious question is: Which iteration failed, and what are its data values? In our example, it isn’t hard to figure out that it’s the second iteration (with index 1) that failed even from the rich condition rendering. At other times this can be more difficult or even impossible.^[2] In any case, Spock makes it loud and clear which iteration failed, rather than just reporting the failure. Iterations of a feature method are by default unrolled with a rich naming pattern. This pattern can also be configured as documented at Unrolled Iteration Names or the unrolling can be disabled like described in the following section.

Method Uprolling and Unrolling

A method annotated with @Rollup will have its iterations not reported independently but only aggregated within the feature. This can for example be used if you produce many test cases from calculations or if you use external data like the contents of a database as test data and do not want the test count to vary:

@Rollup
def "maximum of two numbers"() {
...

Note that up- and unrolling has no effect on how the method gets executed; it is only an alternation in reporting. Depending on the execution environment, the output will look something like:

maximum of two numbers   FAILED

Condition not satisfied:

Math.max(a, b) == c
|    |   |  |  |  |
|    |   7  4  |  7
|    42        false
class java.lang.Math

The @Rollup annotation can also be placed on a spec. This has the same effect as placing it on each data-driven feature method of the spec that does not have an @Unroll annotation.

Alternatively the configuration file setting unrollByDefault in the unroll section can be set to false to roll up all features automatically unless they are annotated with @Unroll or are contained in an @Unrolled spec and thus reinstate the pre Spock 2.0 behavior where this was the default.

Disable Default Unrolling

unroll {
    unrollByDefault false
}

It is illegal to annotate a spec or a feature with both the @Unroll and the @Rollup annotation and if detected this will cause an exception to be thrown.

To summarize:

A feature will be uprolled

if the method is annotated with @Rollup
if the method is not annotated with @Unroll and the spec is annotated with @Rollup
if neither the method nor the spec is annotated with @Unroll and the configuration option unroll { unrollByDefault } is set to false

A feature will be unrolled

if the method is annotated with @Unroll
if the method is not annotated with @Rollup and the spec is annotated with @Unroll
if neither the method nor the spec is annotated with @Rollup and the configuration option unroll { unrollByDefault } is set to its default value true

Data Pipes

Data tables aren’t the only way to supply values to data variables. In fact, a data table is just syntactic sugar for one or more data pipes:

...
where:
a << [1, 7, 0]
b << [3, 4, 0]
c << [3, 7, 0]

A data pipe, indicated by the left-shift (<<) operator, connects a data variable to a data provider. The data provider holds all values for the variable, one per iteration. Any object that Groovy knows how to iterate over can be used as a data provider. This includes objects of type Collection, String, Iterable, and objects implementing the Iterable contract. Data providers don’t necessarily have to be the data (as in the case of a Collection); they can fetch data from external sources like text files, databases and spreadsheets, or generate data randomly. Data providers are queried for their next value only when needed (before the next iteration).

Multi-Variable Data Pipes

If a data provider returns multiple values per iteration (as an object that Groovy knows how to iterate over), it can be connected to multiple data variables simultaneously. The syntax is somewhat similar to Groovy multi-assignment but uses brackets instead of parentheses on the left-hand side:

@Shared sql = Sql.newInstance("jdbc:h2:mem:", "org.h2.Driver")

def "maximum of two numbers"() {
  expect:
  Math.max(a, b) == c

  where:
  [a, b, c] << sql.rows("select a, b, c from maxdata")
}

Data values that aren’t of interest can be ignored with an underscore (_):

...
where:
[a, b, _, c] << sql.rows("select * from maxdata")

The multi-assignments can even be nested. The following example will generate these iterations:

a b c

a	b	c
`['a1', 'a2']`	`'b1'`	`'c1'`
`['a2', 'a1']`	`'b1'`	`'c1'`
`['a1', 'a2']`	`'b2'`	`'c2'`
`['a2', 'a1']`	`'b2'`	`'c2'`

['a1', 'a2']

'b1'

'c1'

['a2', 'a1']

'b1'

'c1'

['a1', 'a2']

'b2'

'c2'

['a2', 'a1']

'b2'

'c2'

...
where:
[a, [b, _, c]] << [
  ['a1', 'a2'].permutations(),
  [
    ['b1', 'd1', 'c1'],
    ['b2', 'd2', 'c2']
  ]
].combinations()

Named deconstruction of data pipes

Since Spock 2.2, multi variable data pipes can also be deconstructed from maps. This is useful when the data provider returns a map with named keys. Or, if you have long values that don’t fit well into a data-table, then using the maps makes it easier to read.

...
where:
[a, b, c] << [
  [
    a: 1,
    b: 3,
    c: 5
  ],
  [
    a: 2,
    b: 4,
    c: 6
  ]
]

You can use named deconstruction with nested data pipes, but only on the innermost nesting level.

...
where:
[a, [b, c]] << [
  [1, [b: 3, c: 5]],
  [2, [c: 6, b: 4]]
]

Data Variable Assignment

A data variable can be directly assigned a value:

...
where:
a = 3
b = Math.random() * 100
c = a > b ? a : b

Assignments are re-evaluated for every iteration. As already shown above, the right-hand side of an assignment may refer to other data variables:

...
where:
row << sql.rows("select * from maxdata")
// pick apart columns
a = row.a
b = row.b
c = row.c

Accessing Other Data Variables

There are only two possibilities to access one data variable from the calculation of another data variable.

The first possibility are derived data variables like shown in the last section. Every data variable that is defined by a direct assignment can access all previously defined data variables, including the ones defined through data tables or data pipes:

...
where:
a = 3
b = Math.random() * 100
c = a > b ? a : b

The second possibility is to access previous columns within data tables:

...
where:
a | b
3 | a + 1
7 | a + 2
0 | a + 3

This also includes columns in previous data tables in the same where block:

...
where:
a | b
3 | a + 1
7 | a + 2
0 | a + 3

and:
c = 1

and:
d     | e
a * 2 | b * 2
a * 3 | b * 3
a * 4 | b * 4

Multi-Variable Assignment

Like with data pipes, you can also assign to multiple variables in one expression, if you have some object Groovy can iterate over. Unlike with data pipes, the syntax here is identical to standard Groovy multi-assignment syntax:

@Shared sql = Sql.newInstance("jdbc:h2:mem:", "org.h2.Driver")

def "maximum of two numbers multi-assignment"() {
  expect:
  Math.max(a, b) == c

  where:
  row << sql.rows("select a, b, c from maxdata")
  (a, b, c) = row
}

Data values that aren’t of interest can be ignored with an underscore (_):

...
where:
row << sql.rows("select * from maxdata")
(a, b, _, c) = row

Combining Data Tables, Data Pipes, and Variable Assignments

Data tables, data pipes, and variable assignments can be combined as needed:

...
where:
a | b
1 | a + 1
7 | a + 2
0 | a + 3

c << [3, 4, 0]

d = a > c ? a : c

Type Coercion for Data Variable Values

Data variable values are coerced to the declared parameter type using type coercion. Due to that custom type conversions can be provided as extension module or with the help of the @Use extension on the specification (as it has no effect to the where: block if applied to a feature).

def "type coercion for data variable values"(Integer i) {
  expect:
  i instanceof Integer
  i == 10

  where:
  i = "10"
}

@Use(CoerceBazToBar)
class Foo extends Specification {
  def foo(Bar bar) {
    expect:
    bar == Bar.FOO

    where:
    bar = Baz.FOO
  }
}
enum Bar { FOO, BAR }
enum Baz { FOO, BAR }
class CoerceBazToBar {
  static Bar asType(Baz self, Class<Bar> clazz) {
    return Bar.valueOf(self.name())
  }
}

Number of Iterations

The number of iterations depends on how much data is available. Successive executions of the same method can yield different numbers of iterations. If a data provider runs out of values sooner than its peers, an exception will occur. Variable assignments don’t affect the number of iterations. A where: block that only contains assignments yields exactly one iteration.

Closing of Data Providers

After all iterations have completed, the zero-argument close method is called on all data providers that have such a method.

Unrolled Iteration Names

By default, the names of unrolled iterations are the name of the feature, plus the data variables and the iteration index. This will always produce unique names and should enable you to identify easily the failing data variable combination.

The example at Reporting of Failures for example shows with maximum of two numbers [a: 7, b: 4, c: 7, #1], that the second iteration (#1) where the data variables have the values 7, 4 and 7 failed.

With a bit of effort, we can do even better:

def "maximum of #a and #b is #c"() {
...

This method name uses placeholders, denoted by a leading hash sign (#), to refer to data variables a, b, and c. In the output, the placeholders will be replaced with concrete values:

maximum of 1 and 3 is 3   PASSED
maximum of 7 and 4 is 7   FAILED

Math.max(a, b) == c
|    |   |  |  |  |
|    |   7  4  |  7
|    42        false
class java.lang.Math

maximum of 0 and 0 is 0   PASSED

Now we can tell at a glance that the max method failed for inputs 7 and 4.

An unrolled method name is similar to a Groovy GString, except for the following differences:

Expressions are denoted with # instead of $, and there is no equivalent for the ${…} syntax.
Expressions only support property access and zero-arg method calls.

Given a class Person with properties name and age, and a data variable person of type Person, the following are valid method names:

def "#person is #person.age years old"() { // property access
def "#person.name.toUpperCase()"() { // zero-arg method call

Non-string values (like #person above) are converted to Strings according to Groovy semantics.

The following are invalid method names:

def "#person.name.split(' ')[1]" {  // cannot have method arguments
def "#person.age / 2" {  // cannot use operators

If necessary, additional data variables can be introduced to hold more complex expressions:

def "#lastName"() {
  ...
  where:
  person << [new Person(age: 14, name: 'Phil Cole')]
  lastName = person.name.split(' ')[1]
}

Additionally, to the data variables the tokens #featureName and #iterationIndex are supported. The former does not make much sense inside an actual feature name, but there are two other places where an unroll-pattern can be defined, where it is more useful.

def "#person is #person.age years old [#iterationIndex]"() {

will be reported as

╷
└─ Spock ✔
   └─ PersonSpec ✔
      └─ #person.name is #person.age years old [#iterationIndex] ✔
         ├─ Fred is 38 years old [0] ✔
         ├─ Wilma is 36 years old [1] ✔
         └─ Pebbles is 5 years old [2] ✔

Alternatively, to specifying the unroll-pattern as method name, it can be given as parameter to the @Unroll annotation which takes precedence over the method name:

@Unroll("#featureName[#iterationIndex] (#person.name is #person.age years old)")
def "person age should be calculated properly"() {
// ...

will be reported as

╷
└─ Spock ✔
   └─ PersonSpec ✔
      └─ person age should be calculated properly ✔
         ├─ person age should be calculated properly[0] (Fred is 38 years old) ✔
         ├─ person age should be calculated properly[1] (Wilma is 36 years old) ✔
         └─ person age should be calculated properly[2] (Pebbles is 5 years old) ✔

The advantage is, that you can have a descriptive method name for the whole feature, while having a separate template for each iteration. Furthermore, the feature method name is not filled with placeholders and thus better readable.

If neither a parameter to the annotation is given, nor the method name contains a #, the configuration file setting defaultPattern in the unroll section is inspected. If it is set to a non-null string, this value is used as unroll-pattern. This could for example be set to

#featureName to have all iterations reported with the same name, or
#featureName[#iterationIndex] to have a simply indexed iteration name, or
#iterationName if you make sure that in each data-driven feature you also set a data variable called iterationName that is then used for reporting

Special Tokens

This is the complete list of special tokens:

#featureName is the name of the feature (mostly useful for the defaultPattern setting)
#iterationIndex is the current iteration index
#dataVariables lists all data variables for this iteration, e.g. x: 1, y: 2, z: 3
#dataVariablesWithIndex the same as #dataVariables but with an index at the end, e.g. x: 1, y: 2, z: 3, #0

Configuration

Set Default Unroll-Pattern

unroll {
    defaultPattern '#featureName[#iterationIndex]'
}

If none of the three described ways is used to set a custom unroll-pattern, by default the feature name is used, suffixed with all data variable names and their values and finally the iteration index, so the result will be for example my feature [x: 1, y: 2, z: 3, #0].

If there is an error in an unroll expression, for example typo in variable name, exception during evaluation of a property or method in the expression and so on, the test will fail. This is not true for the automatic fall back rendering of the data variables if there is no unroll-pattern set in any way, this will never fail the test, no matter what happens.

The failing of test with errors in the unroll expression can be disabled by setting the configuration file setting validateExpressions in the unroll section to false. If this is done and an error happens, the erroneous expression #foo.bar will be substituted by #Error:foo.bar.

Disable Unroll-pattern Expression Asserting

unroll {
    validateExpressions false
}

Some reporting frameworks, or IDEs support proper tree based reporting. For these cases it might be desirable to omit the feature name from the iteration reporting.

Disable repetition of feature name in iterations

unroll {
    includeFeatureNameForIterations false
}

With includeFeatureNameForIterations true

╷
└─ Spock ✔
   └─ ASpec ✔
      └─ really long and informative test name that doesn't have to be repeated ✔
         ├─ really long and informative test name that doesn't have to be repeated [x: 1, y: a, #0] ✔
         ├─ really long and informative test name that doesn't have to be repeated [x: 2, y: b, #1] ✔
         └─ really long and informative test name that doesn't have to be repeated [x: 3, y: c, #2] ✔

With includeFeatureNameForIterations false

╷
└─ Spock ✔
   └─ ASpec ✔
      └─ really long and informative test name that doesn't have to be repeated ✔
         ├─ x: 1, y: a, #0 ✔
         ├─ x: 2, y: b, #1 ✔
         └─ x: 3, y: c, #2 ✔

Note	The same can be achieved for individual features by using `@Unroll('#dataVariablesWithIndex')`.

Interaction Based Testing

Interaction-based testing is a design and testing technique that emerged in the Extreme Programming (XP) community in the early 2000’s. Focusing on the behavior of objects rather than their state, it explores how the object(s) under specification interact, by way of method calls, with their collaborators.

For example, suppose we have a Publisher that sends messages to its `Subscriber`s:

class Publisher {
  List<Subscriber> subscribers = []
  int messageCount = 0
  void send(String message){
    subscribers*.receive(message)
    messageCount++
  }
}

interface Subscriber {
  void receive(String message)
}

class PublisherSpec extends Specification {
  Publisher publisher = new Publisher()
}

How are we going to test Publisher? With state-based testing, we can verify that the publisher keeps track of its subscribers. The more interesting question, though, is whether a message sent by the publisher is received by the subscribers. To answer this question, we need a special implementation of Subscriber that listens in on the conversation between the publisher and its subscribers. Such an implementation is called a mock object.

While we could certainly create a mock implementation of Subscriber by hand, writing and maintaining this code can get unpleasant as the number of methods and complexity of interactions increases. This is where mocking frameworks come in: They provide a way to describe the expected interactions between an object under specification and its collaborators, and can generate mock implementations of collaborators that verify these expectations.

How Are Mock Implementations Generated?

Like most Java mocking frameworks, Spock uses JDK dynamic proxies (when mocking interfaces) and Byte Buddy or CGLIB proxies (when mocking classes) to generate mock implementations at runtime. Compared to implementations based on Groovy meta-programming, this has the advantage that it also works for testing Java code.

The Java world has no shortage of popular and mature mocking frameworks: JMock, EasyMock, Mockito, to name just a few. Although each of these tools can be used together with Spock, we decided to roll our own mocking framework, tightly integrated with Spock’s specification language. This decision was driven by the desire to leverage all of Groovy’s capabilities to make interaction-based tests easier to write, more readable, and ultimately more fun. We hope that by the end of this chapter, you will agree that we have achieved these goals.

Except where indicated, all features of Spock’s mocking framework work both for testing Java and Groovy code.

Creating Mock Objects

Mock objects are created with the MockingApi.Mock() method.^[3] Let’s create two mock subscribers:

def subscriber = Mock(Subscriber)
def subscriber2 = Mock(Subscriber)

Alternatively, the following Java-like syntax is supported, which may give better IDE support:

Subscriber subscriber = Mock()
Subscriber subscriber2 = Mock()

Here, the mock’s type is inferred from the variable type on the left-hand side of the assignment.

Note	If the mock’s type is given on the left-hand side of the assignment, it’s permissible (though not required) to omit it on the right-hand side.

Mock objects literally implement (or, in the case of a class, extend) the type they stand in for. In other words, in our example subscriber is-a Subscriber. Hence it can be passed to statically typed (Java) code that expects this type.

Default Behavior of Mock Objects

Lenient vs. Strict Mocking Frameworks

Like Mockito, we firmly believe that a mocking framework should be lenient by default. This means that unexpected method calls on mock objects (or, in other words, interactions that aren’t relevant for the test at hand) are allowed and answered with a default response. Conversely, mocking frameworks like EasyMock and JMock are strict by default, and throw an exception for every unexpected method call. While strictness enforces rigor, it can also lead to over-specification, resulting in brittle tests that fail with every other internal code change. Spock’s mocking framework makes it easy to describe only what’s relevant about an interaction, avoiding the over-specification trap.

Initially, mock objects have no behavior. Calling methods on them is allowed but has no effect other than returning the default value for the method’s return type (false, 0, or null). An exception are the Object.equals, Object.hashCode, and Object.toString methods, which have the following default behavior: A mock object is only equal to itself, has a unique hash code, and a string representation that includes the name of the type it represents. This default behavior is overridable by stubbing the methods, which we will learn about in the Stubbing section.

Injecting Mock Objects into Code Under Specification

After creating the publisher and its subscribers, we need to make the latter known to the former:

class PublisherSpec extends Specification {
  Publisher publisher = new Publisher()
  Subscriber subscriber = Mock()
  Subscriber subscriber2 = Mock()

  def setup() {
    publisher.subscribers << subscriber // << is a Groovy shorthand for List.add()
    publisher.subscribers << subscriber2
  }

We are now ready to describe the expected interactions between the two parties.

Mocking

Mocking is the act of describing (mandatory) interactions between the object under specification and its collaborators. Here is an example:

def "should send messages to all subscribers"() {
  when:
  publisher.send("hello")

  then:
  1 * subscriber.receive("hello")
  1 * subscriber2.receive("hello")
}

Read out aloud: "When the publisher sends a 'hello' message, then both subscribers should receive that message exactly once."

When this feature method gets run, all invocations on mock objects that occur while executing the when block will be matched against the interactions described in the then: block. If one of the interactions isn’t satisfied, a (subclass of) InteractionNotSatisfiedError will be thrown. This verification happens automatically and does not require any additional code.

Interactions

Is an Interaction Just a Regular Method Invocation?

Not quite. While an interaction looks similar to a regular method invocation, it is simply a way to express which method invocations are expected to occur. A good way to think of an interaction is as a regular expression that all incoming invocations on mock objects are matched against. Depending on the circumstances, the interaction may match zero, one, or multiple invocations.

Let’s take a closer look at the then: block. It contains two interactions, each of which has four distinct parts: a cardinality, a target constraint, a method constraint, and an argument constraint:

1 * subscriber.receive("hello")
|   |          |       |
|   |          |       argument constraint
|   |          method constraint
|   target constraint
cardinality

Cardinality

The cardinality of an interaction describes how often a method call is expected. It can either be a fixed number or a range:

1 * subscriber.receive("hello")      // exactly one call
0 * subscriber.receive("hello")      // zero calls
(1..3) * subscriber.receive("hello") // between one and three calls (inclusive)
(1.._) * subscriber.receive("hello") // at least one call
(_..3) * subscriber.receive("hello") // at most three calls
_ * subscriber.receive("hello")      // any number of calls, including zero
                                     // (rarely needed; see 'Strict Mocking')

Target Constraint

The target constraint of an interaction describes which mock object is expected to receive the method call:

1 * subscriber.receive("hello") // a call to 'subscriber'
1 * _.receive("hello")          // a call to any mock object

Method Constraint

The method constraint of an interaction describes which method is expected to be called:

1 * subscriber.receive("hello") // a method named 'receive'
1 * subscriber./r.*e/("hello")  // a method whose name matches the given regular expression
                                // (here: method name starts with 'r' and ends in 'e')

When expecting a call to a getter method, Groovy property syntax can be used instead of method syntax:

1 * subscriber.status // same as: 1 * subscriber.getStatus()

When expecting a call to a setter method, only method syntax can be used:

1 * subscriber.setStatus("ok") // NOT: 1 * subscriber.status = "ok"

Argument Constraints

The argument constraints of an interaction describe which method arguments are expected:

1 * subscriber.receive("hello")        // an argument that is equal to the String "hello"
1 * subscriber.receive(!"hello")       // an argument that is unequal to the String "hello"
1 * subscriber.receive()               // the empty argument list (would never match in our example)
1 * subscriber.receive(_)              // any single argument (including null)
1 * subscriber.receive(*_)             // any argument list (including the empty argument list)
1 * subscriber.receive(!null)          // any non-null argument
1 * subscriber.receive(_ as String)    // any non-null argument that is-a String
1 * subscriber.receive(endsWith("lo")) // an argument matching the given Hamcrest matcher
                                       // a String argument ending with "lo" in this case
1 * subscriber.receive({ it.size() > 3 && it.contains('a') })
// an argument that satisfies the given predicate, meaning that
// code argument constraints need to return true of false
// depending on whether they match or not
// (here: message length is greater than 3 and contains the character a)

Argument constraints work as expected for methods with multiple arguments:

1 * process.invoke("ls", "-a", _, !null, { ["abcdefghiklmnopqrstuwx1"].contains(it) })

When dealing with vararg methods, vararg syntax can also be used in the corresponding interactions:

interface VarArgSubscriber {
    void receive(String... messages)
}

...

subscriber.receive("hello", "goodbye")

Spock Deep Dive: Groovy Varargs

Groovy allows any method whose last parameter has an array type to be called in vararg style. Consequently, vararg syntax can also be used in interactions matching such methods.

Equality Constraint

The equality constraint uses groovy equality to check the argument, i.e, argument == constraint. You can use

any literal 1 * check('string') / 1 * check(1) / 1 * check(null),
a variable 1 * check(var),
a list or map literal 1 * check([1]) / 1 * check([foo: 'bar']),
an object 1 * check(new Person('sam')),
or the result of a method call 1 * check(person())

as an equality constraint.

Hamcrest Constraint

A variation of the equality constraint, if the constraint object is a Hamcrest matcher, then it will use that matcher to check the argument.

Wildcard Constraint

The wildcard constraint will match any argument null or otherwise. It is the , i.e. 1 * subscriber.receive(). There is also the spread wildcard constraint *_ which matches any number of arguments 1 * subscriber.receive(*_) including none.

Code Constraint

The code constraint is the most versatile of all. It is a groovy closure that gets the argument as its parameter. The closure is treated as an condition block, so it behaves like a then block, i.e., every line is treated as an implicit assertion. It can emulate all but the spread wildcard constraint, however it is suggested to use the simpler constraints where possible. You can do multiple assertions, call methods for assertions, or use with/verifyAll.

1 * list.add({
  verifyAll(it, Person) {
    firstname == 'William'
    lastname == 'Kirk'
    age == 45
  }
})

Negating Constraint

The negating constraint ! is a compound constraint, i.e. it needs to be combined with another constraint to work. It inverts the result of the nested constraint, e.g, 1 * subscriber.receive(!null) is the combination of an equality constraint checking for null and then the negating constraint inverting the result, turning it into not null.

Although it can be combined with any other constraint it does not always make sense, e.g., 1 * subscriber.receive(!_) will match nothing. Also keep in mind that the diagnostics for a non matching negating constraint will just be that the inner constraint did match, without any more information.

Type Constraint

The type constraint checks for the type/class of the argument, like the negating constraint it is also a compound constraint. It usually written as _ as Type, which is a combination of the wildcard constraint and the type constraint. You can combined it with other constraints as well, 1 * subscriber.receive({ it.contains('foo')} as String) will assert that it is a String before executing the code constraint to check if it contains foo.

Matching Any Method Call

Sometimes it can be useful to match "anything", in some sense of the word:

1 * subscriber._(*_)     // any method on subscriber, with any argument list
1 * subscriber._         // shortcut for and preferred over the above

1 * _._                  // any method call on any mock object
1 * _                    // shortcut for and preferred over the above

Note	Although `(_.._) * _._(*_) >> _` is a valid interaction declaration, it is neither good style nor particularly useful.

Strict Mocking

Now, when would matching any method call be useful? A good example is strict mocking, a style of mocking where no interactions other than those explicitly declared are allowed:

when:
publisher.publish("hello")

then:
1 * subscriber.receive("hello") // demand one 'receive' call on 'subscriber'
_ * auditing._                  // allow any interaction with 'auditing'
0 * _                           // don't allow any other interaction

0 * only makes sense as the last interaction of a then: block or method. Note the use of _ * (any number of calls), which allows any interaction with the auditing component.

Note	`_ ` is only meaningful in the context of strict mocking. In particular, it is never necessary when Stubbing an invocation. For example, `_ auditing.record() >> "ok"` can (and should!) be simplified to `auditing.record(``) >> "ok"`.

Where to Declare Interactions

So far, we declared all our interactions in a then: block. This often results in a spec that reads naturally. However, it is also permissible to put interactions anywhere before the when: block that is supposed to satisfy them. In particular, this means that interactions can be declared in a setup method. Interactions can also be declared in any "helper" instance method of the same specification class.

When an invocation on a mock object occurs, it is matched against interactions in the interactions' declared order. If an invocation matches multiple interactions, the earliest declared interaction that hasn’t reached its upper invocation limit will win. There is one exception to this rule: Interactions declared in a then: block are matched against before any other interactions. This allows to override interactions declared in, say, a setup method with interactions declared in a then: block.

Spock Deep Dive: How Are Interactions Recognized?

In other words, what makes an expression an interaction declaration, rather than, say, a regular method call? Spock uses a simple syntactic rule to recognize interactions: If an expression is in statement position and is either a multiplication (*) or a right-shift (>>, >>>) operation, then it is considered an interaction and will be parsed accordingly. Such an expression would have little to no value in statement position, so changing its meaning works out fine. Note how the operations correspond to the syntax for declaring a cardinality (when mocking) or a response generator (when stubbing). Either of them must always be present; foo.bar() alone will never be considered an interaction.

Declaring Interactions at Mock Creation Time

If a mock has a set of "base" interactions that don’t vary, they can be declared right at mock creation time:

Subscriber subscriber = Mock {
   1 * receive("hello")
   1 * receive("goodbye")
}

This feature is particularly attractive for Stubbing and with dedicated Stubs. Note that the interactions don’t (and cannot ^[4]) have a target constraint; it’s clear from the context which mock object they belong to.

Interactions can also be declared when initializing an instance field with a mock:

class MySpec extends Specification {
    Subscriber subscriber = Mock {
        1 * receive("hello")
        1 * receive("goodbye")
    }
}

Grouping Interactions with Same Target

Interactions sharing the same target can be grouped in a Specification.with block. Similar to Declaring Interactions at Mock Creation Time, this makes it unnecessary to repeat the target constraint:

with(subscriber) {
    1 * receive("hello")
    1 * receive("goodbye")
}

A with block can also be used for grouping conditions with the same target.

Mixing Interactions and Conditions

A then: block may contain both interactions and conditions. Although not strictly required, it is customary to declare interactions before conditions:

when:
publisher.send("hello")

then:
1 * subscriber.receive("hello")
publisher.messageCount == 1

Read out aloud: "When the publisher sends a 'hello' message, then the subscriber should receive the message exactly once, and the publisher’s message count should be one."

Explicit Interaction Blocks

Internally, Spock must have full information about expected interactions before they take place. So how is it possible for interactions to be declared in a then: block? The answer is that under the hood, Spock moves interactions declared in a then: block to immediately before the preceding when: block. In most cases this works out just fine, but sometimes it can lead to problems:

when:
publisher.send("hello")

then:
def message = "hello"
1 * subscriber.receive(message)

Here we have introduced a variable for the expected argument. (Likewise, we could have introduced a variable for the cardinality.) However, Spock isn’t smart enough (huh?) to tell that the interaction is intrinsically linked to the variable declaration. Hence it will just move the interaction, which will cause a MissingPropertyException at runtime.

One way to solve this problem is to move (at least) the variable declaration to before the when: block. (Fans of Data Driven Testing might move the variable into a where: block.) In our example, this would have the added benefit that we could use the same variable for sending the message.

Another solution is to be explicit about the fact that variable declaration and interaction belong together:

when:
publisher.send("hello")

then:
interaction {
  def message = "hello"
  1 * subscriber.receive(message)
}

Since an MockingApi.interaction block is always moved in its entirety, the code now works as intended.

Scope of Interactions

Interactions declared in a then: block are scoped to the preceding when: block:

when:
publisher.send("message1")

then:
1 * subscriber.receive("message1")

when:
publisher.send("message2")

then:
1 * subscriber.receive("message2")

This makes sure that subscriber receives "message1" during execution of the first when: block, and "message2" during execution of the second when: block.

Interactions declared outside a then: block are active from their declaration until the end of the containing feature method.

Interactions are always scoped to a particular feature method. Hence they cannot be declared in a static method, setupSpec method, or cleanupSpec method. Likewise, mock objects should not be stored in static or @Shared fields.

Verification of Interactions

There are two main ways in which a mock-based test can fail: An interaction can match more invocations than allowed, or it can match fewer invocations than required. The former case is detected right when the invocation happens, and causes a TooManyInvocationsError:

Too many invocations for:

2 * subscriber.receive(_) (3 invocations)

To make it easier to diagnose why too many invocations matched, Spock will show all invocations matching the interaction in question:

Matching invocations (ordered by last occurrence):

2 * subscriber.receive("hello")   <-- this triggered the error
1 * subscriber.receive("goodbye")

According to this output, one of the receive("hello") calls triggered the TooManyInvocationsError. Note that because indistinguishable calls like the two invocations of subscriber.receive("hello") are aggregated into a single line of output, the first receive("hello") may well have occurred before the receive("goodbye").

The second case (fewer invocations than required) can only be detected once execution of the when block has completed. (Until then, further invocations may still occur.) It causes a TooFewInvocationsError:

Too few invocations for:

1 * subscriber.receive("hello") (0 invocations)

Note that it doesn’t matter whether the method was not called at all, the same method was called with different arguments, the same method was called on a different mock object, or a different method was called "instead" of this one; in either case, a TooFewInvocationsError error will occur.

To make it easier to diagnose what happened "instead" of a missing invocation, Spock will show all invocations that didn’t match any interaction, ordered by their similarity with the interaction in question. In particular, invocations that match everything but the interaction’s arguments will be shown first:

Unmatched invocations (ordered by similarity):

1 * subscriber.receive("goodbye")
1 * subscriber2.receive("hello")

Invocation Order

Often, the exact method invocation order isn’t relevant and may change over time. To avoid over-specification, Spock defaults to allowing any invocation order, provided that the specified interactions are eventually satisfied:

then:
2 * subscriber.receive("hello")
1 * subscriber.receive("goodbye")

Here, any of the invocation sequences "hello" "hello" "goodbye", "hello" "goodbye" "hello", and "goodbye" "hello" "hello" will satisfy the specified interactions.

In those cases where invocation order matters, you can impose an order by splitting up interactions into multiple then: blocks:

then:
2 * subscriber.receive("hello")

then:
1 * subscriber.receive("goodbye")

Now Spock will verify that both "hello"'s are received before the "goodbye". In other words, invocation order is enforced between but not within then: blocks.

Note	Splitting up a `then:` block with `and:` does not impose any ordering, as `and:` is only meant for documentation purposes and doesn’t carry any semantics.

Mocking Classes

Besides interfaces, Spock also supports mocking of classes. Mocking classes works just like mocking interfaces; the only additional requirement is to put byte-buddy 1.9+ or cglib-nodep 3.2.0+ on the class path.

When using for example

normal Mocks or Stubs or
Spys that are configured with useObjenesis: true or
Spys that spy on a concrete instance like Spy(myInstance)

it is also necessary to put objenesis 3.0+ on the class path, except for classes with accessible no-arg constructor or configured constructorArgs unless the constructor call should not be done, for example to avoid unwanted side effects.

If either of these libraries is missing from the class path, Spock will gently let you know.

Stubbing

Stubbing is the act of making collaborators respond to method calls in a certain way. When stubbing a method, you don’t care if and how many times the method is going to be called; you just want it to return some value, or perform some side effect, whenever it gets called.

For the sake of the following examples, let’s modify the Subscriber's receive method to return a status code that tells if the subscriber was able to process a message:

interface Subscriber {
    String receive(String message)
}

Now, let’s make the receive method return "ok" on every invocation:

subscriber.receive(_) >> "ok"

Read out aloud: "Whenever the subscriber receives a message, make it respond with 'ok'."

Compared to a mocked interaction, a stubbed interaction has no cardinality on the left end, but adds a response generator on the right end:

subscriber.receive(_) >> "ok"
|          |       |     |
|          |       |     response generator
|          |       argument constraint
|          method constraint
target constraint

A stubbed interaction can be declared in the usual places: either inside a then: block, or anywhere before a when: block. (See Where to Declare Interactions for the details.) If a mock object is only used for stubbing, it’s common to declare interactions at mock creation time or in a given: block.

Returning Fixed Values

We have already seen the use of the right-shift (>>) operator to return a fixed value:

subscriber.receive(_) >> "ok"

To return different values for different invocations, use multiple interactions:

subscriber.receive("message1") >> "ok"
subscriber.receive("message2") >> "fail"

This will return "ok" whenever "message1" is received, and "fail" whenever "message2" is received. There is no limit as to which values can be returned, provided they are compatible with the method’s declared return type.

Returning Sequences of Values

To return different values on successive invocations, use the triple-right-shift (>>>) operator:

subscriber.receive(_) >>> ["ok", "error", "error", "ok"]

This will return "ok" for the first invocation, "error" for the second and third invocation, and "ok" for all remaining invocations. The right-hand side must be a value that Groovy knows how to iterate over; in this example, we’ve used a plain list.

Computing Return Values

To compute a return value based on the method’s argument, use the the right-shift (>>) operator together with a closure. If the closure declares a single untyped parameter, it gets passed the method’s argument list:

subscriber.receive(_) >> { args -> args[0].size() > 3 ? "ok" : "fail" }

Here "ok" gets returned if the message is more than three characters long, and "fail" otherwise.

In most cases it would be more convenient to have direct access to the method’s arguments. If the closure declares more than one parameter or a single typed parameter, method arguments will be mapped one-by-one to closure parameters:^[5]

subscriber.receive(_) >> { String message -> message.size() > 3 ? "ok" : "fail" }

This response generator behaves the same as the previous one, but is arguably more readable.

If you find yourself in need of more information about a method invocation than its arguments, have a look at org.spockframework.mock.IMockInvocation. All methods declared in this interface are available inside the closure, without a need to prefix them. (In Groovy terminology, the closure delegates to an instance of IMockInvocation.)

Performing Side Effects

Sometimes you may want to do more than just computing a return value. A typical example is throwing an exception. Again, closures come to the rescue:

subscriber.receive(_) >> { throw new InternalError("ouch") }

Of course, the closure can contain more code, for example a println statement. It will get executed every time an incoming invocation matches the interaction.

Chaining Method Responses

Method responses can be chained:

subscriber.receive(_) >>> ["ok", "fail", "ok"] >> { throw new InternalError() } >> "ok"

This will return "ok", "fail", "ok" for the first three invocations, throw InternalError for the fourth invocations, and return ok for any further invocation.

Returning a default response

If you don’t really care what you return, but you must return a non-null value, you can use _. This will use the same logic to compute a response as Stub (see Stubs), so it is only really useful for Mock and Spy instances.

subscriber.receive(_) >> _

You can of course use this with chaining as well. Here it might be useful for Stub instances as well.

subscriber.receive(_) >>> ["ok", "fail"] >> _ >> "ok"

An application of this is to let a Mock behave like a Stub, but still be able to do assertions. The default response will return the mock itself, if the return type of the method is assignable from the mock type (excluding object). This is useful when dealing with fluent APIs, like builders, which are otherwise really painful to mock.

given:
ThingBuilder builder = Mock() {
  _ >> _
}

when:
Thing thing = builder
  .id("id-42")
  .name("spock")
  .weight(100)
  .build()

then:
1 * builder.build() >> new Thing(id: 'id-1337')
thing.id == 'id-1337'

The _ >> _ instructs the mock to return the default response for all interactions. However, interactions defined in the then block will have precedence over the interactions defined in the given block, this lets us override and assert the interaction we actually care about.

Combining Mocking and Stubbing

Mocking and stubbing go hand-in-hand:

1 * subscriber.receive("message1") >> "ok"
1 * subscriber.receive("message2") >> "fail"

When mocking and stubbing the same method call, they have to happen in the same interaction. In particular, the following Mockito-style splitting of stubbing and mocking into two separate statements will not work:

given:
subscriber.receive("message1") >> "ok"

when:
publisher.send("message1")

then:
1 * subscriber.receive("message1")

As explained in Where to Declare Interactions, the receive call will first get matched against the interaction in the then: block. Since that interaction doesn’t specify a response, the default value for the method’s return type (null in this case) will be returned. (This is just another facet of Spock’s lenient approach to mocking.). Hence, the interaction in the given: block will never get a chance to match.

Note	Mocking and stubbing of the same method call has to happen in the same interaction.

Other Kinds of Mock Objects

So far, we have created mock objects with the MockingApi.Mock method. Aside from this method, the MockingApi class provides a couple of other factory methods for creating more specialized kinds of mock objects.

Stubs

A stub is created with the MockingApi.Stub factory method:

Subscriber subscriber = Stub()

Whereas a mock can be used both for stubbing and mocking, a stub can only be used for stubbing. Limiting a collaborator to a stub communicates its role to the readers of the specification.

Note	If a stub invocation matches a mandatory interaction (like `1 * foo.bar()`), an `InvalidSpecException` is thrown.

Like a mock, a stub allows unexpected invocations. However, the values returned by a stub in such cases are more ambitious:

For primitive types, the primitive type’s default value is returned.
For non-primitive numerical values (such as BigDecimal), zero is returned.
If the value is assignable from the stub instance, then the instance is returned (e.g. builder pattern)
For non-numerical values, an "empty" or "dummy" object is returned. This could mean an empty String, an empty collection, an object constructed from its default constructor, or another stub returning default values. See class org.spockframework.mock.EmptyOrDummyResponse for the details.

Note	If the response type of the method is a final class or if it requires a class-mocking library and cglib or ByteBuddy are not available, then the "dummy" object creation will fail with a `CannotCreateMockException`.

A stub often has a fixed set of interactions, which makes declaring interactions at mock creation time particularly attractive:

Subscriber subscriber = Stub {
    receive("message1") >> "ok"
    receive("message2") >> "fail"
}

Spies

(Think twice before using this feature. It might be better to change the design of the code under specification.)

A spy is created with the MockingApi.Spy factory method:

SubscriberImpl subscriber = Spy(constructorArgs: ["Fred"])

A spy is always based on a real object. Hence you must provide a class type rather than an interface type, along with any constructor arguments for the type. If no constructor arguments are provided, the type’s no-arg constructor will be used.

If the given constructor arguments lead to an ambiguity, you can cast the constructor arguments as usual using as or Java-style cast. If the testee for example has one constructor with a String parameter and one with a Pattern parameter and you want null as constructorArg:

SubscriberImpl subscriber = Spy(constructorArgs: [null as String])
SubscriberImpl subscriber2 = Spy(constructorArgs: [(Pattern) null])

You may also create a spy from an instantiated object. This may be useful in cases where you do not have full control over the instantiation of types you are interested in spying. (For example when testing within a Dependency Injection framework such as Spring or Guice.)

Method calls on a spy are automatically delegated to the real object. Likewise, values returned from the real object’s methods are passed back to the caller via the spy.

After creating a spy, you can listen in on the conversation between the caller and the real object underlying the spy:

1 * subscriber.receive(_)

Apart from making sure that receive gets called exactly once, the conversation between the publisher and the SubscriberImpl instance underlying the spy remains unaltered.

When stubbing a method on a spy, the real method no longer gets called:

subscriber.receive(_) >> "ok"

Instead of calling SubscriberImpl.receive, the receive method will now simply return "ok".

Sometimes, it is desirable to both execute some code and delegate to the real method:

subscriber.receive(_) >> { String message -> callRealMethod(); message.size() > 3 ? "ok" : "fail" }

Here we use callRealMethod() to delegate the method invocation to the real object. Note that we don’t have to pass the message argument along; this is taken care of automatically. callRealMethod() returns the real invocation’s result, but in this example we opted to return our own result instead. If we had wanted to pass a different message to the real method, we could have used callRealMethodWithArgs("changed message").

Please note that while semantically both callRealMethod() and callRealMethodWithArgs(…) only make sense with spies, technically you can also call these methods on mock or stub objects, kind of turning them into (pseudo) spy objects "through the backdoor". The only precondition is that the mocked/stubbed object actually has a real method implementation, i.e. for interface mocks there must be a default method, for class mocks there must be a (non-abstract) original method.

Partial Mocks

(Think twice before using this feature. It might be better to change the design of the code under specification.)

Spies can also be used as partial mocks:

// this is now the object under specification, not a collaborator
MessagePersister persister = Spy {
  // stub a call on the same object
  isPersistable(_) >> true
}

when:
persister.receive("msg")

then:
// demand a call on the same object
1 * persister.persist("msg")

Groovy Mocks

So far, all the mocking features we have seen work the same no matter if the calling code is written in Java or Groovy. By leveraging Groovy’s dynamic capabilities, Groovy mocks offer some additional features specifically for testing Groovy code. They are created with the MockingApi.GroovyMock(), MockingApi.GroovyStub(), and MockingApi.GroovySpy() factory methods.

Tip

When Should Groovy Mocks be Favored over Regular Mocks? Groovy mocks should be used when the code under specification is written in Groovy and some of the unique Groovy mock features are needed. When called from Java code, Groovy mocks will behave like regular mocks. Note that it isn’t necessary to use a Groovy mock merely because the code under specification and/or mocked type is written in Groovy. Unless you have a concrete reason to use a Groovy mock, prefer a regular mock.

Mocking Dynamic Methods

All Groovy mocks implement the GroovyObject interface. They support the mocking and stubbing of dynamic methods as if they were physically declared methods:

Subscriber subscriber = GroovyMock()

1 * subscriber.someDynamicMethod("hello")

Mocking All Instances of a Type

(Think twice before using this feature. It might be better to change the design of the code under specification.)

Usually, Groovy mocks need to be injected into the code under specification just like regular mocks. However, when a Groovy mock is created as global, it automagically replaces all real instances of the mocked type for the duration of the feature method:^[6]

def publisher = new Publisher()
publisher << new RealSubscriber() << new RealSubscriber()

RealSubscriber anySubscriber = GroovyMock(global: true)

when:
publisher.publish("message")

then:
2 * anySubscriber.receive("message")

Here, we set up the publisher with two instances of a real subscriber implementation. Then we create a global mock of the same type. This reroutes all method calls on the real subscribers to the mock object. The mock object’s instance isn’t ever passed to the publisher; it is only used to describe the interaction.

Note	A global mock can only be created for a class type. It effectively replaces all instances of that type for the duration of the feature method.

Since global mocks have a somewhat, well, global effect, it’s often convenient to use them together with GroovySpy. This leads to the real code getting executed unless an interaction matches, allowing you to selectively listen in on objects and change their behavior just where needed.

How Are Global Groovy Mocks Implemented?

Global Groovy mocks get their super powers from Groovy meta-programming. To be more precise, every globally mocked type is assigned a custom meta class for the duration of the feature method. Since a global Groovy mock is still based on a CGLIB proxy, it will retain its general mocking capabilities (but not its super powers) when called from Java code.

Mocking Constructors

(Think twice before using this feature. It might be better to change the design of the code under specification.)

Global mocks support mocking of constructors:

RealSubscriber anySubscriber = GroovySpy(global: true)

1 * new RealSubscriber("Fred")

Since we are using a spy, the object returned from the constructor call remains unchanged. To change which object gets constructed, we can stub the constructor:

new RealSubscriber("Fred") >> new RealSubscriber("Barney")

Now, whenever some code tries to construct a subscriber named Fred, we’ll construct a subscriber named Barney instead.

Mocking Static Methods

(Think twice before using this feature. It might be better to change the design of the code under specification.)

Global mocks support mocking and stubbing of static methods:

RealSubscriber anySubscriber = GroovySpy(global: true)

1 * RealSubscriber.someStaticMethod("hello") >> 42

The same works for dynamic static methods.

When a global mock is used solely for mocking constructors and static methods, the mock’s instance isn’t really needed. In such a case one can just write:

GroovySpy(RealSubscriber, global: true)

Advanced Features

Most of the time you shouldn’t need these features. But if you do, you’ll be glad to have them.

A la Carte Mocks

At the end of the day, the Mock(), Stub(), and Spy() factory methods are just canned ways to create mock objects with a certain configuration. If you want more fine-grained control over a mock’s configuration, have a look at the org.spockframework.mock.IMockConfiguration interface. All properties of this interface ^[7] can be passed as named arguments to the Mock() method. For example:

def person = Mock(name: "Fred", type: Person, defaultResponse: ZeroOrNullResponse.INSTANCE, verified: false)

Here, we create a mock whose default return values match those of a Mock(), but whose invocations aren’t verified (as for a Stub()). Instead of passing ZeroOrNullResponse, we could have supplied our own custom org.spockframework.mock.IDefaultResponse for responding to unexpected method invocations.

Detecting Mock Objects

To find out whether a particular object is a Spock mock object, use a org.spockframework.mock.MockUtil:

MockUtil mockUtil = new MockUtil()
List list1 = []
List list2 = Mock()

expect:
!mockUtil.isMock(list1)
mockUtil.isMock(list2)

An util can also be used to get more information about a mock object:

IMockObject mock = mockUtil.asMock(list2)

expect:
mock.name == "list2"
mock.type == List
mock.nature == MockNature.MOCK

Extensions

Spock comes with a powerful extension mechanism, which allows to hook into a spec’s lifecycle to enrich or alter its behavior. In this chapter, we will first learn about Spock’s built-in extensions, and then dive into writing custom extensions.

Spock Configuration File

Some extensions can be configured with options in a Spock configuration file. The description for each extension will mention how it can be configured. All those configurations are in a Groovy file that usually is called SpockConfig.groovy. Spock first searches for a custom location given in a system property called spock.configuration which is then used either as classpath location or if not found as file system location if it can be found there, otherwise the default locations are investigated for a configuration file. Next it searches for the SpockConfig.groovy in the root of the test execution classpath. If there is also no such file, you can at last have a SpockConfig.groovy in your Spock user home. This by default is the directory .spock within your home directory, but can be changed using the system property spock.user.home or if not set the environment property SPOCK_USER_HOME.

Stack Trace Filtering

You can configure Spock whether it should filter stack traces or not by using the configuration file. The default value is true.

Stack Trace Filtering Configuration

runner {
  filterStackTrace false
}

Parallel Execution Configuration

runner {
  parallel {
    //...
  }
}

See the Parallel Execution section for a detailed description.

Built-In Extensions

Most of Spock’s built-in extensions are annotation-driven. In other words, they are triggered by annotating a spec class or method with a certain annotation. You can tell such an annotation by its @ExtensionAnnotation meta-annotation.

Ignore

To temporarily prevent a feature method from getting executed, annotate it with spock.lang.Ignore:

@Ignore
def "my feature"() { ... }

For documentation purposes, a reason can be provided:

@Ignore("TODO")
def "my feature"() { ... }

To ignore a whole specification, annotate its class:

@Ignore
class MySpec extends Specification { ... }

In most execution environments, ignored feature methods and specs will be reported as "skipped".

By default, @Ignore will only affect the annotated specification, by setting inherited to true you can configure it to apply to sub-specifications as well:

@Ignore(inherited = true)
class MySpec extends Specification { ... }
class MySubSpec extends MySpec { ... }

Care should be taken when ignoring feature methods in a spec class annotated with spock.lang.Stepwise since later feature methods may depend on earlier feature methods having executed.

IgnoreRest

To ignore all but a (typically) small subset of methods, annotate the latter with spock.lang.IgnoreRest:

def "I'll be ignored"() { ... }

@IgnoreRest
def "I'll run"() { ... }

def "I'll also be ignored"() { ... }

@IgnoreRest is especially handy in execution environments that don’t provide an (easy) way to run a subset of methods.

Care should be taken when ignoring feature methods in a spec class annotated with spock.lang.Stepwise since later feature methods may depend on earlier feature methods having executed.

IgnoreIf

To ignore a feature method or specification under certain conditions, annotate it with spock.lang.IgnoreIf, followed by a predicate and an optional reason:

@IgnoreIf({ System.getProperty("os.name").toLowerCase().contains("windows") })
def "I'll run everywhere but on Windows"() {

Precondition Context

To make predicates easier to read and write, the following properties are available inside the closure:

sys: A map of all system properties
env: A map of all environment variables
os: Information about the operating system (see spock.util.environment.OperatingSystem)
jvm: Information about the JVM (see spock.util.environment.Jvm)
shared: The shared specification instance, only shared fields will have been initialized. If this property is used, then the whole annotated element cannot be skipped up-front without initializing the shared instance.
instance: The specification instance, if instance fields, shared fields, or instance methods are needed. If this property is used, the whole annotated element cannot be skipped up-front without executing fixtures, data providers and similar. Instead, the whole workflow is followed up to the feature method invocation, where then the closure is checked, and it is decided whether to abort the specific iteration or not.
data: A map of all the data variables for the current iteration. Similar to instance this will run the whole workflow and only skip individual iterations.

Using the os property, the previous example can be rewritten as:

@IgnoreIf({ os.windows })
def "I will run everywhere but on Windows"() {

You can also give an optional reason why the given feature or specification is to be ignored:

@IgnoreIf(value = { os.macOs }, reason = "No platform driver available")
def "For the given reason, I will not run on MacOS"() {

By default, @IgnoreIf will only affect the annotated specification, by setting inherited to true you can configure it to apply to sub-specifications as well:

@IgnoreIf(value = { jvm.java8Compatible }, inherited = true)
abstract class Foo extends Specification {
}

class Bar extends Foo {
  def "I won't run on Java 8 and above"() {
    expect: true
  }
}

If multiple @IgnoreIf annotations are present, they are effectively combined with a logical "or". The annotated element is skipped if any of the conditions evaluates to true:

@IgnoreIf({ os.windows })
@IgnoreIf({ jvm.java8 })
def "I'll run everywhere but on Windows or anywhere on Java 8"() {

Care should be taken when ignoring feature methods in a spec class annotated with spock.lang.Stepwise since later feature methods may depend on earlier feature methods having executed.

To use IDE support like code completion, you can also use the argument to the closure and have it typed as org.spockframework.runtime.extension.builtin.PreconditionContext. This enables the IDE with type information which is not available otherwise:

@IgnoreIf({ PreconditionContext it -> it.os.windows })
def "I will run everywhere but not on Windows"() {

Using data.* to filter out iterations is especially helpful when using .combinations() to generate iterations.

@IgnoreIf({ os.windows })
@IgnoreIf({ data.a == 5 && data.b >= 6 })
def "I'll run everywhere but on Windows and only if a != 5 and b < 6"(int a, int b) {
  // ...
  where:
  [a, b] << [(1..10), (1..8)].combinations()
}

Also note that the condition is split into separate @IgnoreIf annotations so that they can be evaluated independently. It is good practice ordering them based on their specificity, so that the least specific one is evaluated first, that is from static to shared to instance. If you need to combine the conditions in a single @IgnoreIf annotation, you should order them from least specific to most specific inside as well.

Requires

To execute a feature method under certain conditions, annotate it with spock.lang.Requires, followed by a predicate:

@Requires({ os.windows })
def "I'll only run on Windows"() {

Requires works exactly like IgnoreIf, except that the predicate is inverted. In general, it is preferable to state the conditions under which a method gets executed, rather than the conditions under which it gets ignored.

If multiple @Requires annotations are present, they are effectively combined with a logical "and". The annotated element is skipped if any of the conditions evaluates to false:

@Requires({ os.windows })
@Requires({ jvm.java8 })
def "I'll run only on Windows with Java 8"() {

PendingFeature

To indicate that the feature is not fully implemented yet and should not be reported as error, annotate it with spock.lang.PendingFeature.

The use case is to annotate tests that can not yet run but should already be committed. The main difference to Ignore is that the test are executed, but test failures are ignored. If the test passes without an error, then it will be reported as failure since the PendingFeature annotation should be removed. This way the tests will become part of the normal tests instead of being ignored forever.

Groovy has the groovy.transform.NotYetImplemented annotation which is similar but behaves a differently.

it will mark failing tests as passed
if at least one iteration of a data-driven test passes it will be reported as error

PendingFeature:

it will mark failing tests as skipped
if at least one iteration of a data-driven test fails it will be reported as skipped
if every iteration of a data-driven test passes it will be reported as error

@PendingFeature
def "not implemented yet"() { ... }

PendingFeatureIf

To conditionally indicate that a feature is not fully implemented, and should not be reported as an error you can annotate it as spock.lang.PendingFeatureIf and include a precondition similar to IgnoreIf or Requires

If the conditional expression passes it behaves the same way as PendingFeature, otherwise it does nothing.

For instance, annotating a feature as @PendingFeatureIf({ false }) effectively does nothing, but annotating it as @PendingFeatureIf({ true }) behaves the same was as if it was marked as @PendingFeature

If applied to a data driven feature, the closure can also access the data variables. If the closure does not reference any actual data variables, the whole feature is deemed pending and only if all iterations become successful will be marked as failing. But if the closure actually does reference valid data variables, the individual iterations where the condition holds are deemed pending and each will individually fail as soon as it would be successful without this annotation.

@PendingFeatureIf({ os.windows })
def "I'm not yet implemented on windows, but I am on other operating systems"() {

@PendingFeatureIf({ sys.targetEnvironment == "prod" })
def "This feature isn't deployed out to production yet, and isn't expected to pass"() {

It is also supported to have multiple @PendingFeatureIf annotations or a mixture of @PendingFeatureIf and @PendingFeature, for example to ignore certain exceptions only under certain conditions.

@PendingFeature(exceptions = UnsupportedOperationException)
@PendingFeatureIf(
  exceptions = IllegalArgumentException,
  value = { os.windows },
  reason = 'Does not yet work on Windows')
@PendingFeatureIf(
  exceptions = IllegalAccessException,
  value = { jvm.java8 },
  reason = 'Does not yet work on Java 8')
def "I have various problems in certain situations"() {

Stepwise

To execute features in the order that they are declared, annotate a spec class with spock.lang.Stepwise:

@Stepwise
class RunInOrderSpec extends Specification {
  def "I run first"()  { expect: true }
  def "I run second"() { expect: false }
  def "I will be skipped"() { expect: true }
}

Stepwise only affects the class carrying the annotation; not sub or super classes. Features after the first failure are skipped.

Stepwise does not override the behaviour of annotations such as Ignore, IgnoreRest, and IgnoreIf, so care should be taken when ignoring feature methods in spec classes annotated with Stepwise.

Note	This will also set the execution mode to `SAME_THREAD`, see Parallel Execution for more information.

Since Spock 2.2, Stepwise can be applied to data-driven feature methods, having the effect of executing them sequentially (even if concurrent test mode is active) and to skip subsequent iterations if one iteration fails:

class SkipAfterFailingIterationSpec extends Specification {
  @Stepwise
  def "iteration #count"()  {
    expect:
    count != 3

    where:
    count << (1..5)
  }
}

This will pass for the first two iterations, fail on the third and skip the remaining two. Without Stepwise on feature method level, the third iteration would fail and the remaining 4 iterations would pass.

Note

For backward compatibility with Spock versions prior to 2.2, applying the annotation on spec level will not automatically skip subsequent feature method iterations upon failure in a previous iteration. If you want that in addition to (or instead of) step-wise spec mode, you do have to annotate each individual feature method you wish to have that capability. This also conforms to the principle that if you want to skip tests under whatever conditions, you ought to document your intent explicitly.

Timeout

To fail a feature method, fixture, or class that exceeds a given execution duration, use spock.lang.Timeout, followed by a duration, and optionally a time unit. The default time unit is seconds.

When applied to a feature method, the timeout is per execution of one iteration, excluding time spent in fixture methods:

@Timeout(5)
def "I fail if I run for more than five seconds"() { ... }

@Timeout(value = 100, unit = TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS)
def "I better be quick" { ... }

Applying Timeout to a spec class has the same effect as applying it to each feature that is not already annotated with Timeout, excluding time spent in fixtures:

@Timeout(10)
class TimedSpec extends Specification {
  def "I fail after ten seconds"() { ... }
  def "Me too"() { ... }

  @Timeout(value = 250, unit = MILLISECONDS)
  def "I fail much faster"() { ... }
}

When applied to a fixture method, the timeout is per execution of the fixture method.

When a timeout is reported to the user, the stack trace shown reflects the execution stack of the test framework when the timeout was exceeded.

Retry

The @Retry extensions can be used for flaky integration tests, where remote systems can fail sometimes. By default it retries an iteration 3 times with 0 delay if either an Exception or AssertionError has been thrown, all this is configurable. In addition, an optional condition closure can be used to determine if a feature should be retried. It also provides special support for data driven features, offering to either retry all iterations or just the failing ones.

class FlakyIntegrationSpec extends Specification {
  @Retry
  def retry3Times() { ... }

  @Retry(count = 5)
  def retry5Times() { ... }

  @Retry(exceptions=[IOException])
  def onlyRetryIOException() { ... }

  @Retry(condition = { failure.message.contains('foo') })
  def onlyRetryIfConditionOnFailureHolds() { ... }

  @Retry(condition = { instance.field != null })
  def onlyRetryIfConditionOnInstanceHolds() { ... }

  @Retry
  def retryFailingIterations() {
    ...
    where:
    data << sql.select()
  }

  @Retry(mode = Retry.Mode.FEATURE)
  def retryWholeFeature() {
    ...
    where:
    data << sql.select()
  }

  @Retry(delay = 1000)
  def retryAfter1000MsDelay() { ... }
}

Retries can also be applied to spec classes which has the same effect as applying it to each feature method that isn’t already annotated with {@code Retry}.

@Retry
class FlakyIntegrationSpec extends Specification {
  def "will be retried with config from class"() {
    ...
  }
  @Retry(count = 5)
  def "will be retried using its own config"() {
    ...
  }
}

A {@code @Retry} annotation that is declared on a spec class is applied to all features in all subclasses as well, unless a subclass declares its own annotation. If so, the retries defined in the subclass are applied to all feature methods declared in the subclass as well as inherited ones.

Given the following example, running FooIntegrationSpec will execute both inherited and foo with one retry. Running BarIntegrationSpec will execute inherited and bar with two retries.

@Retry(count = 1)
abstract class AbstractIntegrationSpec extends Specification {
  def inherited() {
    ...
  }
}

class FooIntegrationSpec extends AbstractIntegrationSpec {
  def foo() {
    ...
  }
}

@Retry(count = 2)
class BarIntegrationSpec extends AbstractIntegrationSpec {
  def bar() {
    ...
  }
}

Check RetryFeatureExtensionSpec for more examples.

Use

To activate one or more Groovy categories within the scope of a feature method or spec, use spock.util.mop.Use:

class ListExtensions {
  static avg(List list) { list.sum() / list.size() }
}

class UseDocSpec extends Specification {
  @Use(ListExtensions)
  def "can use avg() method"() {
    expect:
    [1, 2, 3].avg() == 2
  }
}

This can be useful for stubbing of dynamic methods, which are usually provided by the runtime environment (e.g. Grails). It has no effect when applied to a helper method. However, when applied to a spec class, it will also affect its helper methods.

To use multiple categories, you can either give multiple categories to the value attribute of the annotation or you can apply the annotation multiple times to the same target.

Note	This will also set the execution mode to `SAME_THREAD` if applied on a `Specification`, see Parallel Execution for more information.

ConfineMetaClassChanges

To confine meta class changes to the scope of a feature method or spec class, use spock.util.mop.ConfineMetaClassChanges:

@Stepwise
class ConfineMetaClassChangesDocSpec extends Specification {
  @ConfineMetaClassChanges(String)
  def "I run first"() {
    when:
    String.metaClass.someMethod = { delegate }

    then:
    String.metaClass.hasMetaMethod('someMethod')
  }

  def "I run second"() {
    when:
    "Foo".someMethod()

    then:
    thrown(MissingMethodException)
  }
}

When applied to a spec class, the meta classes are restored to the state that they were in before setupSpec was executed, after cleanupSpec is executed.

When applied to a feature method, the meta classes are restored to as they were after setup was executed, before cleanup is executed.

To confine meta class changes for multiple classes, you can either give multiple classes to the value attribute of the annotation or you can apply the annotation multiple times to the same target.

Caution

Temporarily changing the meta classes is only safe when specs are run in a single thread per JVM. Even though many execution environments do limit themselves to one thread per JVM, keep in mind that Spock cannot enforce this.

Note	This will acquire a `READ_WRITE` lock for `Resources.META_CLASS_REGISTRY`, see Parallel Execution for more information.

RestoreSystemProperties

Saves system properties before the annotated feature method (including any setup and cleanup methods) gets run, and restores them afterwards.

Applying this annotation to a spec class has the same effect as applying it to all its feature methods.

@RestoreSystemProperties
def "determines family based on os.name system property"() {
  given:
  System.setProperty('os.name', 'Windows 7')

  expect:
  OperatingSystem.current.family == OperatingSystem.Family.WINDOWS
}

Caution

Temporarily changing the values of system properties is only safe when specs are run in a single thread per JVM. Even though many execution environments do limit themselves to one thread per JVM, keep in mind that Spock cannot enforce this.

Note	This will acquire a `READ_WRITE` lock for `Resources.SYSTEM_PROPERTIES`, see Parallel Execution for more information.

AutoAttach

Automatically attaches a detached mock to the current Specification. Use this if there is no direct framework support available. Spring and Guice dependency injection is automatically handled by the Spring Module and Guice Module respectively.

AutoCleanup

Automatically clean up a field or property at the end of its lifetime by using spock.lang.AutoCleanup.

By default, an object is cleaned up by invoking its parameterless close() method. If some other method should be called instead, override the annotation’s value attribute:

// invoke foo.dispose()
@AutoCleanup("dispose")
def foo

If multiple fields or properties are annotated with AutoCleanup, their objects are cleaned up sequentially, in reverse field/property declaration order, starting from the most derived class class and walking up the inheritance chain.

If a cleanup operation fails with an exception, the exception is reported by default, and cleanup proceeds with the next annotated object. To prevent cleanup exceptions from being reported, override the annotation’s quiet attribute:

@AutoCleanup(quiet = true)
def ignoreMyExceptions

TempDir

In order to generate a temporary directory for test and delete it after test, annotate a member field of type java.io.File, java.nio.file.Path or untyped using def in a spec class (def will inject a Path). Alternatively, you can annotate a field with a custom type that has a public constructor accepting either java.io.File or java.nio.file.Path as its single parameter (see FileSystemFixture for an example). If the annotated field is @Shared, the temporary directory will be shared in the corresponding specification, otherwise every feature method and every iteration per parametrized feature method will have their own temporary directories:

// all features will share the same temp directory path1
@TempDir
@Shared
Path path1

// all features and iterations will have their own path2
@TempDir
File path2

// will be injected using java.nio.file.Path
@TempDir
def path3

// use a custom class that accepts java.nio.file.Path as sole constructor parameter
@TempDir
FileSystemFixture path4

def demo() {
  expect:
  path1 instanceof Path
  path2 instanceof File
  path3 instanceof Path
  path4 instanceof FileSystemFixture
}

If you want to customize the parent directory for temporary directories, you can use the Spock Configuration File.

If keep is set to true, Spock will not delete temporary directories after tests. The default value is taken from system property spock.tempDir.keep or false, if undefined.

Temporary Directory Configuration

tempdir {
  // java.nio.Path object, default null,
  // which means system property "java.io.tmpdir"
  baseDir Paths.get("/tmp")
  // boolean, default is system property "spock.tempDir.keep"
  keep true
}

Title and Narrative

To attach a natural-language name to a spec, use spock.lang.Title:

@Title("This is easy to read")
class ThisIsHarderToReadSpec extends Specification {
  ...
}

Similarly, to attach a natural-language description to a spec, use spock.lang.Narrative:

@Narrative("""
As a user
I want foo
So that bar
""")
class GiveTheUserFooSpec() { ... }

See

To link to one or more references to external information related to a specification or feature, use spock.lang.See:

@See("https://spockframework.org/spec")
class SeeDocSpec extends Specification {
  @See(["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levenshtein_distance", "https://www.levenshtein.net/"])
  def "Even more information is available on the feature"() {
    expect: true
  }

  @See("https://www.levenshtein.de/")
  @See(["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levenshtein_distance", "https://www.levenshtein.net/"])
  def "And even more information is available on the feature"() {
    expect: true
  }
}

Issue

To indicate that a feature or spec relates to one or more issues in an external tracking system, use spock.lang.Issue:

@Issue("https://my.issues.org/FOO-1")
class IssueDocSpec extends Specification {
  @Issue("https://my.issues.org/FOO-2")
  def "Foo should do bar"() {
    expect: true
  }

  @Issue(["https://my.issues.org/FOO-3", "https://my.issues.org/FOO-4"])
  def "I have two related issues"() {
    expect: true
  }

  @Issue(["https://my.issues.org/FOO-5", "https://my.issues.org/FOO-6"])
  @Issue("https://my.issues.org/FOO-7")
  def "I have three related issues"() {
    expect: true
  }
}

If you have a common prefix URL for all issues in a project, you can use the Spock Configuration File to set it up for all at once. If it is set, it is prepended to the value of the @Issue annotation when building the URL.

If the issueNamePrefix is set, it is prepended to the value of the @Issue annotation when building the name for the issue.

Issue Configuration

report {
    issueNamePrefix 'Bug '
    issueUrlPrefix 'https://my.issues.org/'
}

Subject

To indicate one or more subjects of a spec, use spock.lang.Subject:

@Subject([Foo, Bar])
class SubjectDocSpec extends Specification {

You can also use multiple @Subject annotations:

@Subject(Foo)
@Subject(Bar)
class SubjectDocSpec extends Specification {

Additionally, Subject can be applied to fields and local variables:

@Subject
Foo myFoo

Subject currently has only informational purposes.

Rule

Spock understands @org.junit.Rule annotations on non-@Shared instance fields when the JUnit 4 module is included. The according rules are run at the iteration interception point in the Spock lifecycle. This means that the rules before-actions are done before the execution of setup methods and the after-actions are done after the execution of cleanup methods.

ClassRule

Spock understands @org.junit.ClassRule annotations on @Shared fields when the JUnit 4 module is included. The according rules are run at the specification interception point in the Spock lifecycle. This means that the rules before-actions are done before the execution of setupSpec methods and the after-actions are done after the execution of cleanupSpec methods.

Include and Exclude

Spock is capable of including and excluding specifications according to their classes, super-classes and interfaces and according to annotations that are applied to the specification.Spock is also capable of including and excluding individual features according to annotations that are applied to the feature method.The configuration for what to include or exclude is done according to the Spock Configuration File section.

Include / Exclude Configuration

import some.pkg.Fast
import some.pkg.IntegrationSpec

runner {
  include Fast // could be either an annotation or a (base) class
  exclude {
    annotation some.pkg.Slow
    baseClass IntegrationSpec
  }
}

Optimize Run Order

Spock can remember which features last failed and how often successively and also how long a feature needed to be tested. For successive runs Spock will then first run features that failed at last run and first features that failed more often successively. Within the previously failed or non-failed features Spock will run the fastest tests first. This behaviour can be enabled according to the Spock Configuration File section. The default value is false.

Optimize Run Order Configuration

runner {
  optimizeRunOrder true
}

Third-Party Extensions

You can find a list of third-party extensions in the Spock Wiki.

Writing Custom Extensions

There are two types of extensions that can be created for usage with Spock. These are global extensions and annotation driven local extensions. For both extension types you implement a specific interface which defines some callback methods. In your implementation of those methods you can set up the magic of your extension, for example by adding interceptors to various interception points that are described below.

It depends on your use case which type of annotation you create. If you want to do something once during the Spock run - at the start or end - or want to apply something to all executed specifications without the user of the extension having to do anything besides including your extension in the classpath, then you should opt for a global extension. If you instead want to apply your magic only by choice of the user, then you should implement an annotation driven local extension.

Global Extensions

To create a global extension you need to create a class that implements the interface IGlobalExtension and put its fully-qualified class name in a file META-INF/services/org.spockframework.runtime.extension.IGlobalExtension in the class path. As soon as these two conditions are satisfied, the extension is automatically loaded and used when Spock is running.

IGlobalExtension has the following three methods:

start(): This is called once at the very start of the Spock execution.
visitSpec(SpecInfo spec): This is called once for each specification. In this method you can prepare a specification with your extension magic, like attaching interceptors to various interception points as described in the chapter Interceptors.
stop(): This is called at least once at the very end of the Spock execution.

Annotation Driven Local Extensions

To create an annotation driven local extension you need to create a class implementing the interface IAnnotationDrivenExtension. As type argument to the interface you need to supply an annotation class having @Retention set to RUNTIME, @Target set to one or more of FIELD, METHOD, and TYPE - depending on where you want your annotation to be applicable - and @ExtensionAnnotation applied, with the IAnnotationDrivenExtension class as argument. Of course the annotation class can have some attributes with which the user can further configure the behaviour of the extension for each annotation application.

Your annotation can be applied to a specification, a feature method, a fixture method or a field. On all other places like helper methods or other places if the @Target is set accordingly, the annotation will be ignored and has no effect other than being visible in the source code, except you check its existence in other places yourself.

Since Spock 2.0 your annotation can also be defined as @Repeatable and applied multiple times to the same target. IAnnotationDrivenExtension has visit…Annotations methods that are called by Spock with all annotations of the extension applied to the same target. Their default implementations will then call the respective singular visit…Annotation method once for each annotation. If you want a repeatable annotation that is compatible with Spock before 2.0 you need to make the container annotation an extension annotation itself and handle all cases accordingly, but you need to make sure to only handle the container annotation if Spock version is before 2.0, or your annotations might be handled twice. Be aware that the repeatable annotation can be attached to the target directly, inside the container annotation or even both if the user added the container annotation manually and also attached one annotation directly.

IAnnotationDrivenExtension has the following nine methods, where in each you can prepare a specification with your extension magic, like attaching interceptors to various interception points as described in the chapter Interceptors:

visitSpecAnnotations(List<T> annotations, SpecInfo spec): This is called once for each specification where the annotation is applied one or multiple times with the annotation instances as first parameter, and the specification info object as second parameter. The default implementation calls visitSpecAnnotation once for each given annotation.
visitSpecAnnotation(T annotation, SpecInfo spec): This is used as singular delegate for visitSpecAnnotations and is otherwise not called by Spock directly. The default implementation throws an exception.
visitFieldAnnotations(List<T> annotations, FieldInfo field): This is called once for each field where the annotation is applied one or multiple times with the annotation instances as first parameter, and the field info object as second parameter. The default implementation calls visitFieldAnnotation once for each given annotation.
visitFieldAnnotation(T annotation, FieldInfo field): This is used as singular delegate for visitFieldAnnotations and is otherwise not called by Spock directly. The default implementation throws an exception.
visitFixtureAnnotations(List<T> annotations, MethodInfo fixtureMethod): This is called once for each fixture method where the annotation is applied one or multiple times with the annotation instances as first parameter, and the fixture method info object as second parameter. The default implementation calls visitFixtureAnnotation once for each given annotation.
visitFixtureAnnotation(T annotation, MethodInfo fixtureMethod): This is used as singular delegate for visitFixtureAnnotations and is otherwise not called by Spock directly. The default implementation throws an exception.
visitFeatureAnnotations(List<T> annotations, FeatureInfo feature): This is called once for each feature method where the annotation is applied one or multiple times with the annotation instances as first parameter, and the feature info object as second parameter. The default implementation calls visitFeatureAnnotation once for each given annotation.
visitFeatureAnnotation(T annotation, FeatureInfo feature): This is used as singular delegate for visitFeatureAnnotations and is otherwise not called by Spock directly. The default implementation throws an exception.
visitSpec(SpecInfo spec): This is called once for each specification within which the annotation is applied to at least one of the supported places like defined above. It gets the specification info object as sole parameter. This method is called after all other methods of this interface for each applied annotation are processed.

Configuration Objects

You can add own sections in the Spock Configuration File for your extension by creating POJOs or POGOs that are annotated with @ConfigurationObject and have a default constructor (either implicitly or explicitly). The argument to the annotation is the name of the top-level section that is added to the Spock configuration file syntax. The default values for the configuration options are defined in the class by initializing the fields at declaration time or in the constructor. In the Spock configuration file those values can then be edited by the user of your extension.

Note	It is an error to have multiple configuration objects with the same name, so choose wisely if you pick one and probably prefix it with some package-like name to minimize the risk for name clashes with other extensions or the core Spock code.

To use the values of the configuration object in your extension, you can either use constructor injection or field injection.

To use constructor injection just define a constructor with one or more configuration object parameters.
To use field injection just define an uninitialized non-final instance field of that type.

Spock will then automatically create exactly one instance of the configuration object per Spock run, apply the settings from the configuration file to it (before the start() methods of global extensions are called) and inject that instance into the extension class instances.

Note

Constructor injection has a higher priority than field injection and Spock won’t inject any fields if it finds a suitable constructor. If you want to support both Spock 1.x and 2.x you can either use only field injection (Spock 1.x only supports field injection), or you can have both a default constructor and an injectable constructor, this way Spock 2.x will use constructor injection and Spock 1.x will use field injection.

If a configuration object should be used exclusively in an annotation driven local extension you must register it in META-INF/services/spock.config.ConfigurationObject. This is similar to a global extension, put the fully-qualified class name of the annotated class on a new line in the file. This will cause the configuration object to properly get initialized and populated with the settings from the configuration file. However, if the configuration object is used in a global extension, you can also use it just fine in an annotation driven local extension. If the configuration object is only used in an annotation driven local extension, you will get an exception when then configuration object is to be injected into the extension, and you will also get an error when the configuration file is evaluated, and it contains the section, as the configuration object is not properly registered yet.

Interceptors

For applying the magic of your extension, there are various interception points, where you can attach interceptors from the extension methods described above to hook into the Spock lifecycle. For each interception point there can of course be multiple interceptors added by arbitrary Spock extensions (shipped or 3rd party). Their order currently depends on the order they are added, but there should not be made any order assumptions within one interception point.

Figure 1. Spock Interceptors

An ellipsis in the figure means that the block before it can be repeated an arbitrary amount of times.

The … method interceptors are of course only run if there are actual methods of this type to be executed (the white boxes) and those can inject parameters to be given to the method that will be run.

The difference between shared initializer interceptor and shared initializer method interceptor and between initializer interceptor and initializer method interceptor - as there can be at most one of those methods each - is, that there are only the two methods if there are @Shared, respectively non-@Shared, fields that get values assigned at declaration time. The compiler will put those initializations in a generated method and call it at the proper place in the lifecycle. So if there are no such initializations, no method is generated and thus the method interceptor is never called. The non-method interceptors are always called at the proper place in the lifecycle to do work that has to be done at that time.

To create an interceptor to be attached to an interception point, you need to create a class that implements the interface IMethodInterceptor. This interface has the sole method intercept(IMethodInvocation invocation). The invocation parameter can be used to get and modify the current state of execution. Each interceptor must call the method invocation.proceed(), which will go on in the lifecycle, except you really want to prevent further execution of the nested elements like shown in the figure above. But this should be a very rare use case.

If you write an interceptor that can be used at different interception points and should do different work at different interception points, there is also the convenience class AbstractMethodInterceptor, which you can extend and which provides various methods for overriding that are called for the various interception points. Most of these methods have a double meaning, like interceptSetupMethod which is called for the setup interceptor and the setup method interceptor. If you attach your interceptor to both of them and need a differentiation, you can check for invocation.method.reflection, which will be set in the method interceptor case and null otherwise. Alternatively you can of course build two different interceptors or add a parameter to your interceptor and create two instances, telling each at addition time whether it is attached to the method interceptor or the other one.

Add All Interceptors

class I extends AbstractMethodInterceptor { I(def s) {} }

// On SpecInfo
specInfo.addSharedInitializerInterceptor new I('shared initializer')
specInfo.sharedInitializerMethod?.addInterceptor new I('shared initializer method')
specInfo.addInterceptor new I('specification')
specInfo.addSetupSpecInterceptor new I('setup spec')
specInfo.setupSpecMethods*.addInterceptor new I('setup spec method')
specInfo.allFeatures*.addInterceptor new I('feature')
specInfo.addInitializerInterceptor new I('initializer')
specInfo.initializerMethod?.addInterceptor new I('initializer method')
specInfo.allFeatures*.addIterationInterceptor new I('iteration')
specInfo.addSetupInterceptor new I('setup')
specInfo.setupMethods*.addInterceptor new I('setup method')
specInfo.allFeatures*.featureMethod*.addInterceptor new I('feature method')
specInfo.addCleanupInterceptor new I('cleanup')
specInfo.cleanupMethods*.addInterceptor new I('cleanup method')
specInfo.addCleanupSpecInterceptor new I('cleanup spec')
specInfo.cleanupSpecMethods*.addInterceptor new I('cleanup spec method')
specInfo.allFixtureMethods*.addInterceptor new I('fixture method')

// on FeatureInfo
featureInfo.addInterceptor new I('feature')
featureInfo.addIterationInterceptor new I('iteration')
featureInfo.featureMethod.addInterceptor new I('feature method')

Injecting Method Parameters

If your interceptor should support custom method parameters for wrapped methods, this can be done by modifying invocation.arguments. Two use cases for this would be a mocking framework that can inject method parameters that are annotated with a special annotation, or some test helper that injects objects of a specific type that are created and prepared for usage automatically.

When called from at least Spock 2.0, the arguments array will always have the size of the method parameter count, so you can directly set the arguments you want to set. You cannot change the size of the arguments array either. All parameters that did not yet get any value injected, either from data variables or some extension, will have the value MethodInfo.MISSING_ARGUMENT and if any of those remain, after all interceptors were run, an exception will be thrown.

Note

When your extension might be used with a version before Spock 2.0, the arguments array may be an empty array or an array of arbitrary length, depending on what interceptors were run before that maybe also have manipulated this array for parameter injection. If you for example investigated the method parameters with invocation.method.reflection.parameters and found that you want to inject the fifth parameter, you should first check whether the arguments array is at least five elements long. If not, you should assign it a new array that is at least five elements long and copy the contents of the old array into the new one. Then you can assign your objects to be injected.

Inject Method Parameters

// create a map of all MyInjectable parameters with their parameter index
Map<Parameter, Integer> parameters = [:]
invocation.method.reflection.parameters.eachWithIndex { parameter, i ->
  parameters << [(parameter): i]
}
parameters = parameters.findAll { MyInjectable.equals it.key.type }

// enlarge arguments array if necessary
def lastMyInjectableParameterIndex = parameters*.value.max()
lastMyInjectableParameterIndex = lastMyInjectableParameterIndex == null ?
                                 0 :
                                 lastMyInjectableParameterIndex + 1
if(invocation.arguments.length < lastMyInjectableParameterIndex) {
  def newArguments = new Object[lastMyInjectableParameterIndex]
  System.arraycopy invocation.arguments, 0, newArguments, 0, invocation.arguments.length
  invocation.arguments = newArguments
}

parameters.each { parameter, i ->
  invocation.arguments[i] = new MyInjectable(parameter)
}

Note

Pre Spock 2.0 only: When using data driven features (methods with a where: block), the user of your extension has to follow some restrictions, if parameters should be injected by your extension:

all data variables and all to-be-injected parameters have to be defined as method parameters
all method parameters have to be assigned a value in the where: block, for example null
the order of the method parameters has to be identical to the order of the data variables in the where: block

Of course, you can also make your extension only inject a value if none is set already, as the where: block assignments happen before the method interceptor is called

for this simply check whether invocation.arguments[i] is null or not

Data Driven Feature with Injected Parameter pre Spock 2.0

def 'test parameter injection'(a, b, MyInjectable myInjectable) {
  expect: myInjectable

  where:
  a    | b
  'a1' | 'b1'
  'a2' | 'b2'

  and:
  myInjectable = null
}

Data Driven Feature with Injected Parameter post Spock 2.0

def 'test parameter injection'(MyInjectable myInjectable) {
  expect: myInjectable

  where:
  a    | b
  'a1' | 'b1'
  'a2' | 'b2'
}

Utilities

Testing Time with `MutableClock`

When working with dates or time we often have the problem of writing stable tests. Java only provides a FixedClock for testing. However, often time related code has to deal with the change of time, so a fixed clock is not enough or makes the test harder to follow.

The prerequisite for using both FixedClock and Spocks MutableClock is that the production code, actually uses a configurable Clock and not just the parameterless Instant.now() or the corresponding methods in the other java.time.* classes.

Example

Class under Test

public class AgeFilter implements Predicate<LocalDate> {
  private final Clock clock;
  private final int age;

  public AgeFilter(Clock clock, int age) {                                       // (1)
    this.clock = clock;
    this.age = age;
  }

  @Override
  public boolean test(LocalDate date) {
    return Period.between(date, LocalDate.now(clock)).getYears() >= age;         // (2)
  }
}

Clock is injected via constructor
Clock is used to get the current date

Test

def "AgeFilter reacts to time"() {
  given:
  ZonedDateTime defaultTime = ZonedDateTime.of(2018, 6, 5, 0, 0, 0, 0, ZoneId.of('UTC'))
  MutableClock clock = new MutableClock(defaultTime)                                       // (1)
  AgeFilter ageFilter = new AgeFilter(clock,18)                                            // (2)

  LocalDate birthday = defaultTime.minusYears(18).plusDays(1).toLocalDate()

  expect:
  !ageFilter.test(birthday)                                                                // (3)

  when:
  clock + Duration.ofDays(1)                                                               // (4)

  then:
  ageFilter.test(birthday)                                                                 // (5)
}

MutableClock created with a well known time
Clock is injected via constructor
age is less than 18 so the result is false
the clock is advanced by one day
age is equal to 18 so the result is true

There are many more ways to modify MutableClock just have a look at the JavaDocs, or the test code spock.util.time.MutableClockSpec.

Collection Conditions

Sometimes, you want to assert the elements of a collection regardless of their order. The Groovy way to do this is to cast both to Set, i.e. x as Set == [1, 2, 3] as Set. While this works, it is very noisy.

Since Spock 2.1 you can use two new conditions:

x =~ [1, 2, 3] is a lenient match, i.e., checking that x contains at least one instance of every item in the list (same semantics as casting both to Set before comparing).
x ==~ [1, 2, 3, 3] is a strict match, i.e., checking that x contains exactly the items in the list regardless of their order (using Hamcrest’s containsInAnyOrder under the hood).

Lenient Match

def x = [2, 2, 1, 3, 3]
assert x =~ [4, 1, 2]

x =~ [4, 1, 2]
| |
| false
| 2 differences (66% similarity, 1 missing, 1 extra)
| missing: [4]
| extra: [3]
[2, 1, 3]

Strict Match

def x = [2, 2, 1, 3, 3]
assert x ==~ [4, 1, 2]

x ==~ [4, 1, 2]
| |
| false
[2, 2, 1, 3, 3]

Expected: iterable with items [<4>, <1>, <2>] in any order
     but: not matched: (2)

Note	Both operands must be `Iterable` for this to work. Otherwise, it will be treated like the standard groovy find operator or match operators.

Interact with the file system using `FileSystemFixture`

In integration tests you often have to prepare the file system for a test. For trivial cases like creating a single temp directory, you can use the @TempDir extension directly. However, for more complex cases like creating a directory tree FileSystemFixture offers convenience and better readability.

Examples

Creating a directory tree

@TempDir
FileSystemFixture fsFixture

def "FileSystemFixture can create a directory structure"() {
  when:
  fsFixture.create {
    dir('src') {
      dir('main') {
        dir('groovy') {
          file('HelloWorld.java') << 'println "Hello World"'
        }
      }
      dir('test/resources') {
        file('META-INF/MANIFEST.MF') << 'bogus entry'
        copyFromClasspath('/org/spockframework/smoke/extension/SampleFile.txt')
      }
    }
  }

  then:
  Files.isDirectory(fsFixture.resolve('src/main/groovy'))
  Files.isDirectory(fsFixture.resolve('src/test/resources/META-INF'))
  fsFixture.resolve('src/main/groovy/HelloWorld.java').text == 'println "Hello World"'
  fsFixture.resolve('src/test/resources/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF').text == 'bogus entry'
  fsFixture.resolve('src/test/resources/SampleFile.txt').text == 'HelloWorld\n'
}

Tip	To get the nice Groovy methods for `Path`, you need to add a dependency on `groovy-nio`.

Parallel Execution

Warning

This is an experimental feature for Spock, which is based on the experimental implementation of parallel execution in the JUnit Platform.

Parallel execution has the potential to reduce the overall test execution time. The actual achievable reduction will heavily depend on the respective codebase and can vary wildly.

By default, Spock runs tests sequentially with a single thread. As of version 2.0, Spock supports parallel execution based on the JUnit Platform. To enable parallel execution set the runner.parallel.enabled configuration to true. See Spock Configuration File for general information about this file.

SpockConfig.groovy

runner {
  parallel {
    enabled true
  }
}

Note

JUnit Jupiter also supports parallel execution, both rely on the JUnit Platform implementation, but function independently of each other. If you enable parallel execution in Spock it won’t affect Jupiter and vice versa. The JUnit Platform executes the test engines (Spock, Jupiter) sequentially, so there should not be any interference between engines.

Execution modes

Spock supports two execution modes SAME_THREAD and CONCURRENT. You can define the execution mode explicitly for a specification or feature via the @Execution annotation. Otherwise, Spock will use the value of defaultSpecificationExecutionMode and defaultExecutionMode respectively, both have CONCURRENT as default value. Certain extensions also set execution modes when they are applied.

defaultSpecificationExecutionMode controls what execution mode a specification will use by default.
defaultExecutionMode controls what execution mode a feature and its iterations (if data driven) will use by default.

Figure 2. Sequential Execution, either runner.parallel.enabled=false or SAME_THREAD Specifications, SAME_THREAD Features

Figure 3. CONCURRENT Specifications, CONCURRENT Features

Figure 4. CONCURRENT Specifications, SAME_THREAD Features

Figure 5. SAME_THREAD Specifications, CONCURRENT Features

Execution Hierarchy

Figure 6. Legend for the following figures

The node Same Thread will run in the same thread as its parent.
The node Concurrent will be executed in another thread, all concurrent nodes can execute in different threads from each other.
The node ResourceLock(READ) will be executed in another thread, but will also acquire a READ-lock for a resource.
The node ResourceLock(READ_WRITE) will be executed in another thread, but will also acquire a READ_WRITE-lock for a resource.
The node Same Thread with Lock will run in the same thread as its parent thus inheriting the lock.
The node Data Driven Feature represents a data driven feature with Data Driven Feature[1] and Data Driven Feature[2] being the iterations.
The node Isolated will run exclusively, no other specifications or features will run at the same time.

Figure 7. Single threaded execution

Figure 7 shows the default case when parallel execution is disabled (runner.parallel.enabled=false) or when both specifications (defaultSpecificationExecutionMode) and features (defaultExecutionMode) are set to SAME_THREAD.

execution hierarchy concurrent sequential execution

Figure 8. Execution with CONCURRENT Specifications, SAME_THREAD

Figure 8 shows the result of setting defaultSpecificationExecutionMode=CONCURRENT and defaultExecutionMode=SAME_THREAD, the specifications will run concurrently but all features will run in the same thread as their specification.

execution hierarchy sequential concurrent execution

Figure 9. Execution with SAME_THREAD Specifications, CONCURRENT Features

Figure 9 shows the result of setting defaultSpecificationExecutionMode=SAME_THREAD and defaultExecutionMode=CONCURRENT, the specifications will run in the same thread, causing them to run one after the other. The features inside a specification will run concurrently.

execution hierarchy concurrent concurrent execution

Figure 10. Execution with CONCURRENT Specifications, CONCURRENT Features

Figure 10 shows the result of setting defaultSpecificationExecutionMode=CONCURRENT and defaultExecutionMode=CONCURRENT, both specifications and features will run concurrently.

Execution Mode Inheritance

If nothing else is explicit configured, specifications will use defaultSpecificationExecutionMode and features use defaultExecutionMode. However, this changes when you set the execution mode explicitly via @Execution. Each node (specification, feature) checks first if it has an explicit execution mode set, otherwise it will check its parents for an explicit setting and fall back to the respective defaults otherwise.

The following examples have defaultSpecificationExecutionMode=SAME_THREAD and defaultExecutionMode=SAME_THREAD. If you invert the values SAME_THREAD and CONCURRENT in these examples you will get the inverse result.

execution hierarchy inheritance feature execution

Figure 11. Execution with SAME_THREAD Specifications, SAME_THREAD Features and explicit @Execution on Features

In Figure 11 @Execution is applied on the features and those features and iterations will execute concurrently while the rest will execute in the same thread.

execution hierarchy inheritance spec execution

Figure 12. Execution with SAME_THREAD Specifications, SAME_THREAD Features and explicit @Execution on a Specification

In Figure 12 @Execution is applied on one specification causing the specification and all its features to run concurrently. The features execute concurrently since they inherit the explicit execution mode from the specification.

execution hierarchy inheritance spec feature execution

Figure 13. Execution with SAME_THREAD Specifications, SAME_THREAD Features and explicit @Execution on Features and Specifications

Figure 13 showcases the combined application of @Execution on a specification and some of its features. As in the previous example the specification and its features will execute concurrently except testB1 since it has its own explicit execution mode set.

Resource Locks

With parallel execution comes a new set of challenges for testing, as shared state can be modified and consumed by multiple tests at the same time.

A simple example would be two features that test the use a system property, both setting it to a specific value in the respective given block and then executing the code to test the expected behavior. If they run sequentially then both complete without issue. However, if the run at the same time both given blocks will run before the when blocks and one feature will fail since the system property did not contain the expected value.

The above example could simply be fixed if both features are part of the same specification by setting them to run in the same thread with @Execution(SAME_THREAD). However, this is not really practicable when the features are in separate specifications. To solve this issue Spock has support to coordinate access to shared resources via @ResourceLock.

With @ResourceLock you can define both a key and a mode. By default, @ResourceLock assumes ResourceAccessMode.READ_WRITE, but you can weaken it to ResourceAccessMode.READ.

ResourceAccessMode.READ_WRITE will enforce exclusive access to the resource.
ResourceAccessMode.READ will prevent any READ_WRITE locks, but will allow other READ locks.

READ-only locks will isolate tests from others that modify the shared resource, while at the same time allowing tests that also only read the resource to execute. You should not modify the shared resource when you only hold a READ lock, otherwise the assurances don’t hold.

Certain extensions also set implicit locks when they are applied.

Figure 14. Two features with @ResourceLock

Lock inheritance

If a parent node has a READ_WRITE lock, it forces its children to run in the same thread. As READ_WRITE locks cause serialized execution anyway, this is effectively not different from what would happen if the lock would be applied to every child directly. However, if the parent node has only READ locks, then it allows parallel execution of its children.

Figure 15. Locks on data driven features

Figure 16. Locks on spec inherited by features

Lock coarsening

To avoid deadlocks, Spock pulls up locks to the specification, when locks are defined on both the specification and features. The Specification will then contain all defined locks. If the features both had READ_WRITE and READ locks for the same resource, then the READ will be merged into the READ_WRITE.

Figure 17. Lock coarsening - before

Figure 18. Lock coarsening - after

Isolated Execution

Sometimes, you want to modify and test something that affects every other feature, you could put a READ @ResourceLock on every feature, but that is impractical. The @Isolated extension enforces, that only this feature runs without any other features running at the same time. You can think of this as an implicit global lock.

As with other locks, the features in an @Isolated specification will run in SAME_THREAD mode. @Isolated can only be applied at the specification level so if you have a large specification and only need it for a few features, you might want to consider splitting the spec into @Isolated and non isolated.

Figure 19. @Isolated execution

Parallel Thread Pool

With parallel execution enabled, specifications and features can execute concurrently. You can control the size of the thread pool that executes the features. Spock uses Runtime.getRuntime().availableProcessors() to determine the available processors.

dynamic(BigDecimal factor) - Computes the desired parallelism based on the number of available processors multiplied by the factor and rounded down to the nearest integer. For example a factor of 0.5 will use half your processors.
dynamicWithReservedProcessors(BigDecimal factor, int reservedProcessors) - Same as dynamic but ensures that the given amount of reservedProcessors is not used. The reservedProcessors are counted against the available cores not the result of the factor.
fixed(int parallelism) - Uses the given amount of threads.
custom(int parallelism, int minimumRunnable, int maxPoolSize, int corePoolSize, int keepAliveSeconds) - Allows complete control over the threadpool. However, it should only be used when the other options are insufficient, and you need that extra bit of control. Check the Javadoc of spock.config.ParallelConfiguration for a detailed description the parameters.

By default, Spock uses dynamicWithReservedProcessors(1.0, 2) that is all your logical processors minus 2.

If the calculated parallelism is less than 2, then Spock will execute single threaded, basically the same as runner.parallel.enabled=false.

Example SpockConfig.groovy with fixed setting

runner {
  parallel {
    enabled true
    fixed(4)
  }
}

Modules

JUnit 4 Module

Integration with JUnit 4 features for Spock 2+ (which internally uses JUnit Platform - part of JUnit 5). Please add dependency org.spockframework:spock-junit4 to your project.

The module is required for:

running JUnit 4 rules and class ruless (@Rule/@ClassRule)
using JUnit 4’s test fixture annotations (@BeforeClass, @Before, @After, @AfterClass)

Note	This module does its best to support old features from JUnit 4, however, users are encouraged to migrate to the native Spock counterparts.

Guice Module

Integration with the Guice IoC container. Please add dependency org.spockframework:spock-guice to your project. For examples see the specs in the codebase.

With Spock 1.2+ detached mocks are automatically attached to the Specification if they are injected via @Inject.

Spring Module

The Spring module enables integration with Spring TestContext Framework. It supports the following spring annotations @ContextConfiguration and @ContextHierarchy. Furthermore, it supports the meta-annotation @BootstrapWith and so any annotation that is annotated with @BootstrapWith will also work, such as @SpringBootTest, @WebMvcTest. Please add dependency org.spockframework:spock-spring to your project.

Mocks

Spock 1.1 introduced the DetachedMockFactory and the SpockMockFactoryBean which allow the creation of Spock mocks outside of a specification.

Note

Although the mocks can be created outside of a specification, they only work properly inside the scope of a specification. All interactions with them until they are attached to one, are handled by the default behavior and not recorded.
Furthermore, mocks can only be attached to one Specification instance at a time so keep that in mind when using multi-threaded executions

Java Config

class DetachedJavaConfig {
  def mockFactory = new DetachedMockFactory()

  @Bean
  GreeterService serviceMock() {
    return mockFactory.Mock(GreeterService)
  }

  @Bean
  GreeterService serviceStub() {
    return mockFactory.Stub(GreeterService)
  }

  @Bean
  GreeterService serviceSpy() {
    return mockFactory.Spy(GreeterServiceImpl)
  }

  @Bean
  FactoryBean<GreeterService> alternativeMock() {
    return new SpockMockFactoryBean(GreeterService)
  }
}

XML

Spock has spring namespace support, so if you declare the spock namespace with xmlns:spock="https://www.spockframework.org/spring" you get access to the convenience functions for creating mocks.

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"
       xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
       xmlns:spock="http://www.spockframework.org/spring"
       xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans
           https://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans.xsd
           http://www.spockframework.org/spring https://www.spockframework.org/spring/spock.xsd">

  <spock:mock id="serviceMock" class="org.spockframework.spring.docs.GreeterService"/>   (1)
  <spock:stub id="serviceStub" class="org.spockframework.spring.docs.GreeterService"/>   (2)
  <spock:spy id="serviceSpy" class="org.spockframework.spring.docs.GreeterServiceImpl"/> (3)

  <bean id="someExistingBean" class="java.util.ArrayList"/>                              (4)
  <spock:wrapWithSpy ref="someExistingBean"/>                                            (4)

  <bean id="alternativeMock" class="org.spockframework.spring.xml.SpockMockFactoryBean"> (5)
    <constructor-arg value="org.spockframework.spring.docs.GreeterService"/>
    <property name="mockNature" value="MOCK"/>                                           (6)
  </bean>


</beans>

Creates a Mock
Creates a Stub
Creates a Spy
Wraps an existing bean with a Spy. Fails fast if referenced bean is not found.
If you don’t want to use the special namespace support you can create the beans via the SpockMockFactoryBean
The mockNature can be MOCK, STUB, or SPY and defaults to MOCK if not declared.

Usage

To use the mocks just inject them like any other bean and configure them as usual.

@Autowired @Named('serviceMock')
GreeterService serviceMock

@Autowired @Named('serviceStub')
GreeterService serviceStub

@Autowired @Named('serviceSpy')
GreeterService serviceSpy

@Autowired @Named('alternativeMock')
GreeterService alternativeMock

def "mock service"() {
  when:
  def result = serviceMock.greeting

  then:
  result == 'mock me'
  1 * serviceMock.getGreeting() >> 'mock me'
}

def "sub service"() {
  given:
  serviceStub.getGreeting() >> 'stub me'

  expect:
  serviceStub.greeting == 'stub me'
}

def "spy service"() {
  when:
  def result = serviceSpy.greeting

  then:
  result == 'Hello World'
  1 * serviceSpy.getGreeting()
}

def "alternative mock service"() {
  when:
  def result = alternativeMock.greeting

  then:
  result == 'mock me'
  1 * alternativeMock.getGreeting() >> 'mock me'
}

Annotation driven

Spock 1.2 adds support for exporting mocks from a Specification into an ApplicationContext. This was inspired by Spring Boot’s @MockBean(realised via Mockito) but adapted to fit into Spock style. It does not require any Spring Boot dependencies, however it requires Spring Framework 4.3.5 or greater to work.

Using `@SpringBean`

Registers mock/stub/spy as a spring bean in the test context.

To use @SpringBean you have to use a strongly typed field def or Object won’t work. You also need to directly assign the Mock/Stub/Spy to the field using the standard Spock syntax. You can even use the initializer blocks to define common behavior, however they are only picked up once they are attached to the Specification.

@SpringBean definitions can replace existing Beans in your ApplicationContext.

Note

Spock’s @SpringBean actually creates a proxy in the ApplicationContext which forwards everything to the current mock instance. The type of the proxy is determined by the type of the annotated field.
The proxy attaches itself to the current mock in the setup phase, that is why the mock must be created when the field is initialized.

@SpringBean
Service1 service1 = Mock()

@SpringBean
Service2 service2 = Stub() {
  generateQuickBrownFox() >> "blubb"
}

def "injection with stubbing works"() {
  expect:
  service2.generateQuickBrownFox() == "blubb"
}

def "mocking works was well"() {
  when:
  def result = service1.generateString()

  then:
  result == "Foo"
  1 * service1.generateString() >> "Foo"
}

Caution

As with Spring’s own @MockBean this will modify your ApplicationContext, and will create an unique context for your Specification preventing it from being reused by Spring’s Context Caching outside of the current Specification.
If you are using a small context this won’t matter much, but if it is a heavy context you might want to use the other approaches, e.g., using the DetachedMockFactory.

Using `@SpringSpy`

If you want to spy on an existing bean, you can use the @SpringSpy annotation to wrap the bean in a spy. As with @SpringBean the field must be of the type you want to spy on, however you cannot use an initializer.

@SpringSpy
Service2 service2

@Autowired
Service1 service1

def "default implementation is used"() {
  expect:
  service1.generateString() == "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog."
}

def "mocking works was well"() {
  when:
  def result = service1.generateString()

  then:
  result == "Foo"
  1 * service2.generateQuickBrownFox() >> "Foo"
}

Using `@StubBeans`

@StubBeans registers plain Stub instances in an ApplicationContext. Use this if you just need to satisfy some dependencies without actually doing anything with these stubs. If you need to control the stubs, e.g., configure return values then use @SpringBean instead. Like @SpringBean @StubBeans also replaced existing BeanDefinitions,so you can use it to remove real beans from an ApplicationContext. @StubBeans can be replaced by @SpringBean, this can be useful if you need to replace some @StubBeans defined in a parent class.

@StubBeans(Service2)
@ContextConfiguration(classes = DemoMockContext)
class StubBeansExamples extends Specification {

Spring Boot

The recommended way to use Spock mocks in @WebMvcTest or other @SpringBootTest-style tests, is to use the @SpringBean and @SpringSpy annotations as shown above.

Alternatively you can use an embedded config annotated with @TestConfiguration and to create the mocks using the DetachedMockFactory.

@WebMvcTest
class WebMvcTestIntegrationSpec extends Specification {

  @Autowired
  MockMvc mvc

  @Autowired
  HelloWorldService helloWorldService

  def "spring context loads for web mvc slice"() {
    given:
    helloWorldService.getHelloMessage() >> 'hello world'

    expect: "controller is available"
    mvc.perform(MockMvcRequestBuilders.get("/"))
      .andExpect(status().isOk())
      .andExpect(content().string("hello world"))
  }

  @TestConfiguration
  static class MockConfig {
    def detachedMockFactory = new DetachedMockFactory()

    @Bean
    HelloWorldService helloWorldService() {
      return detachedMockFactory.Stub(HelloWorldService)
    }
  }
}

For more examples see the specs in the codebase and boot examples.

Scopes

Spock ignores bean that is not a singleton (in the singleton scope) by default. To enable mocks to work for scoped beans you need to add @ScanScopedBeans to the spec and make sure that the scope allows access to the bean during the setup phase.

Note	The `request` and `session` scope will throw exceptions by default, if there is no active request/session.

You can limit the scanning to certain scopes by using the value property of @ScanScopedBeans.

Shared fields injection

Due to certain limitations, injection into shared fields is not enabled by default but can be opted-in to. Refer to javadoc of org.spockframework.spring.EnableSharedInjection for further information.

Tapestry Module

Integration with the Tapestry5 IoC container. Please add dependency org.spockframework:spock-tapestry to your project. For examples see the specs in the codebase.

Unitils Module

Integration with the Unitils library. Please add dependency org.spockframework:spock-unitils to your project. For examples see the specs in the codebase.

Grails Module

The Grails plugin has moved to its own GitHub project. It has legacy status and was last released for Spock 0.7 and Groovy versions 1.8 and 2.0, because it is no longer necessary.

Note	Grails 2.3 and higher have built-in Spock support and do not require a plugin.

Release Notes

2.2 (2022-08-31)

Support for @SpringBean and @SpringSpy marked with @Primary #1503
Fix issue that displayName values for the Specification, which were changed by extensions such as @Title, not being picked up. #1509
Update to JUnit 5.9.0

Thanks to all the contributors to this release: Alexander Kriegisch, Marcin Zajączkowski, Jonny Carter, alopukhov, Jerome Prinet, Matthew Moss, BJ Hargrave, konradczajka

2.2-M3 (2022-07-15)

Add support for IterationSelector to run individual iterations
Update to JUnit 5.9.0-RC1

Thanks to all the contributors to this release: Marc Philipp

2.2-M2 (2022-07-15)

Add junit-platform TestTag support with the @Tag extension #1467
Add IDataDriver extension point and refactor data provider handling #1479
Add named deconstruction for multi variable datapipes. This might lead to changed behavior results if the data object implements Map but supports both positional getAt(int) and named getAt(String) access. In earlier versions, the positional access was used, but now the named access will be used. #1463
Add custom class support to @TempDir, you can use any class that has a single java.io.File or java.nio.file.Path as constructor parameter #1430
Improve @Stepwise can be applied to data-driven feature methods, having the effect of executing them sequentially (even if concurrent test mode is active) and to skip subsequent iterations is one iteration fails. #1442
Improve EmbeddedSpecCompiler by making package declaration configurable in EmbeddedSpecCompiler
Improve do not evaluate feature-skipping conditions for skipped specs #1459
Improve behavior when trying to run Spock with unsupported Groovy version in IDEA #1421
Improve Java 17 compatibility by using new invokeDefault instead of reflection
Fix compatibility with certain locales, for example tr_TR #1414
Fix Spring 6 incompatibility #1428
Fix test reporting issue with Maven, where an error on the Specification level was not visible #1444
Fix context pollution in IterationNode.around() #1441
Fix Discard unnecessary state in ConfineMetaClassChangesInterceptor #1460
Fix make EnableSharedInjection public #1472
Fix gradle module metadata dependencies #1490
Remove runtime dependency on Jetbrains Annotations #1468

Thanks to all the contributors to this release: Alexander Kriegisch, Marcin Zajączkowski, Jonny Carter, alopukhov, Jerome Prinet, Matthew Moss, BJ Hargrave

2.2-M1 (2022-02-16)

Add Groovy 4 support #1382

No other changes to the 2.1 release.

Thanks to all the contributors to this release: Marcin Zajączkowski

2.1 (2022-02-15)

No functional changes to 2.1-M2.

Official Spock Logo

The Spock Framework Project has an official logo. Many thanks to Ayşe Altınsoy (@AltinsoyAyse) for creating the logo through many iterations.

Misc

Documentation fixes
Build maintenance

Thanks to all the contributors to this release: Marc Philipp, Miles Thomason, BJ Hargrave, Marcin Zajączkowski, Lőrinc Pap, Felipe Pedrosa, Marcin Świerczyński, Benedikt Ritter, Alexander Kriegisch, Jérôme Prinet, Pin Zhang

2.1-M2 (2021-11-12)

Fix issue with generated gradle module metadata that caused issues with consumers.
Update JUnit, ASM, ByteBuddy dependencies.

2.1-M1 (2021-11-12)

Highlights

Add collection conditions #1372
Add support for selecting individual iterations via their unique ID (IDE support required). #1376

Breaking Changes

Add data. support to conditional extensions #1360. This replaces the current behavior of accessing data variables without any prefix. See Precondition Context for more details.

Misc

Add exception translation to JUnit4 Rules #1342
Add option to omit feature name from iterations #1386 and add additional Special Tokens to unroll patterns.
Add optional reason to @Requires and @IgnoreIf #1362
Add shared. support to conditional extensions #1359. See Precondition Context for more details.
Set the owner for condition closures on spec annotations #1357

This allows access to static methods when @IgnoreIf, @Requires and @PendingFeatureIf is used on a Specification.
Update bnd Gradle plugin to 6.0.0 (OSGI) #1377
Fix selector ordering issue #1375
Fix @TempDir not working for @Shared inherited fields #1373
Fix JUnit rule run order #1363
Prevent removal of ErrorSpecNode from execution hierarchy #1358

As the ErrorSpecNode does not have children it would get removed when trying to select specific tests methods For example, gradle will report that no test were found, and not report the actual error.
Fix double invocation of IRunListener.beforeSpec and IRunListener.afterSpec #1344
Fix regression with multi-assignment of method call result #1333
Fix Build MethodSource with the correct spec class name #1345

Prior to this fix, all SpockNode that use a MethodSource did not use the actual test class of the discovered method, and instead used the declaring class. This was problematic for inherited test methods, since they appeared to come from the declaring class instead of the current test class. In addition, the Maven Surefire provider failed to match such methods when executing tests matching a mask (e.g., via -Dtest=*MaskTest).
Automatically test on CI with JDK 17 (only -groovy-3.0 variant)

Thanks to all the contributors to this release: Marc Philipp, Miles Thomason, BJ Hargrave, Marcin Zajączkowski, Lőrinc Pap, Felipe Pedrosa, Marcin Świerczyński, Benedikt Ritter

2.0 (2021-05-17)

Highlights

Spock is now a test engine based on the JUnit Platform
Spock now supports Parallel Execution on the spec and feature level, with powerful tools for shared resource access.
Support for Groovy 3
Data driven tests are now unrolled by default with a more informative naming scheme
Data driven tests can now declare a subset of parameters, which are injected by name instead of position.

... and many more, read the full release notes for every detail.

Migrating from 1.x

The Migration Guide 1.x - 2.0 covers the major breaking changes between 1.3 and 2.0

Breaking Changes (from 2.0-M5)

Remove @ResourceLockChildren again, as JUnit Platform 5.7.2 makes it obsolete. With the update a READ lock on a parent node, does not force same thread execution on its children. If you are one of the few that have already used @ResourceLockChildren, just replace it with @ResourceLock.

Misc

Fix NPE if variable is initialized using a method with the same in features with cleanup blocks or using thrown condition #1266 #1313
Fix implicit this conversion after bugfix in Groovy 3.0.8 #1318
Fix extension-provided method arguments in fixture methods #1305
Update Jvm helper to support versions up to 23 (next LTS release)

Thanks to all the contributors (all 2.0 Milestones): Björn Kautler, Marcin Zajączkowski, DQYuan, Marcin Erdmann, Alexander Kriegisch, Jasper Vandemalle, Tom Wieczorek, Josh Soref, Vaidotas Valuckas, Raymond Augé, Roman Tretiak, Camilo Jorquera, Shil Sinha, Ryan Gardner, k3v1n0x90

Special thanks goes to Marc Philipp who helped a lot with the integration of the JUnit Platform.

2.0-M5 (2021-03-23)

Breaking Changes

The ReportLogExtension vestiges were removed. As this extension was mostly used for an unreleased Spock module, this won’t affect many users. If you are using a Spock Configuration File with a report section, then you must delete everything from this section except for issueNamePrefix and issueUrlPrefix. These two properties are still supported and used by the @Issue extension.

Misc

Add support for injection into @Shared fields in spock-spring module which users can opt-in for by adding @EnableSharedInjection to the specification. #76

Add new displayName via INameable for SpecInfo, FeatureInfo, and IterationInfo. This field can be set via extensions to change the reported name. The existing iteration NameProvider now also sets the displayName instead of the name. Modifying the name instead of displayName is now considered deprecated for extensions. #1236
Add support for constructor injection for extensions
Improve final field handling. Final fields are now transformed similar to shared fields, so that we can still delay the initialization but keep them unmodifiable to user code. #1011
Improve parallel extensions to support inheritance #1245
Improve PollingConditions
Improve some AST transformation code regarding error handling
Deprecate AbstractGlobalExtension and replace with IGlobalExtension
Remove unnecessary try-finally construct for assertions
Fix ErrorSpecNode throw Exception in prepare instead of execute this fixes an issue that interceptors for prepare, before, and around were still executed and any Exception they throw would hide the actual cause.
Fix #1294 swallowing of unrecoverable Errors
Fix #1260 Change InteractionRewriter to keep casting of ListExpressions intact
Fix #1282 Make TempDirInterceptor safe for parallel invocation of iterations
Fix #1267 Retry extension behavior for unrolled tests
Fix #1267 Retry extension behavior for unrolled tests
Fix #1229 @TempDir not working for inherited fields
Fix #1232 compile error for nested conditions without top-level condition
Fix #1256 handling of is as getter for boolean properties on Mocks
Fix #1270 handling of is as getter for boolean properties on GroovyMocks
Fix ErrorSpecNode to re-throw Exception in prepare instead of execute, this fixes an issue that interceptors for prepare, before, and around were still executed and any Exception they throw would hide the actual cause.
Fix #1263 ExceptionAdapterExtension to also handle inherited fixture methods
Fix #1279 Cast data variables with type coercion to the declared parameter type

Thanks to all the contributors to this release: Marcin Erdmann, Björn Kautler, Alexander Kriegisch, Josh Soref, Vaidotas Valuckas

2.0-M4 (2020-11-01)

Added Parallel Execution support
Add a way to register ConfigurationObject globally without the need for a global extension.
Annotations for local extensions can now be defined as @Repeatable and applied multiple times to the same target. Spock will handle this appropriately and call the extensions visitSpecAnnotations method with all annotations. If these methods are not overwritten, they forward to the usual visitSpecAnnotation methods once for each annotation.
@ConfineMetaClassChanges, @Issue, @IgnoreIf, @PendingFeatureIf, @Requires, @See, @Subject, @Use, and @UseModules are now repeatable annotations
@Requires, @IgnoreIf and @PendingFeatureIf can now access instance fields, shared fields and instance methods by using the instance. qualifier inside the condition closure.
AbstractAnnotationDrivenExtension is now deprecated and its logic was moved to default methods of IAnnotationDrivenExtension which should be implemented directly now instead of extending the abstract class.
Add @TempDir built-in extension
@PendingFeature and @PendingFeatureIf can now be used together
Fix #1158 Fix strange bug with setter/getter handling of mocks in groovy
Fix #1216 perform argument coercion for GroovyMock method arguments
Fix #1169 check skipped state in Node.prepare and do nothing if already skipped
Fix #1200 name clashes where variables that are named like method calls destroy the method call
Fix #1202 NullPointerException with array initializers
Fix #994 don’t treat nested closures in argument constraints as implicit assertions anymore
Replace hamcrest-core dependency by hamcrest

Thanks to all the contributors to this release: Björn Kautler, Marcin Zajączkowski, DQYuan, Tom Wieczorek, Alexander Kriegisch, Jasper Vandemalle

2.0-M3 (2020-06-11)

Breaking Changes

Sputnik Runner removed (an alternative)

In 2.0-M1 the Sputnik runner was removed and the 2.0-M2 release notes explicitly mentioned that enhancements that extend Sputnik or use it as a delegate like for example the PowerMockRunnerDelegate will not work anymore.

This is not the full truth though, but be aware that the information in this section is just for informational purpose. This is not a solution the Spock maintainers explicitly support or maintain. It is just mentioned as hint for those that have no other choice right now. It is strongly recommended to instead use native solutions or integrations. If those are not available, you might consider asking about proper integration with Spock for a proper long-term solution. As long as this is not available, the work-around described here is at least usable as fallback and mid-term solution as long as the JUnit team decides to maintain this legacy support module.

There is a JUnit 4 runner provided by JUnit 5 called JUnitPlatform that can run any JUnit platform based tests - like Spock 2+ based tests - in a JUnit 4 environment. This is intended for situations where an IDE, build tool, CI server, or similar does not yet natively support JUnit platform. It is provided in the artifact org.junit.platform:junit-platform-runner.

This means, if you make sure your tests are launched with JUnit 4 and you use JUnitPlatform where you before used Sputnik, all should work out properly. In case of PowerMock this means you annotate your specification with @RunWith(PowerMockRunner) and @PowerMockRunnerDelegate(JUnitPlatform) and make sure your tests are launched using JUnit 4.

Removal of JUnit 4 dependency from spock-core

Spock 2.0 from the beginning has leveraged JUnit Platform to execute tests. However, starting with 2.0-M3 junit4.jar is no longer a transitive dependency of spock-core. This might affect people using @Before/@After/… instead of Spock-native setup/cleanup/… fixture methods. To keep it work the spock-junit4 dependency has to be added.

As a side effect of the removal, the order of the fixture methods execution has changed from:

beforeClass, setupSpec, before, setup, cleanup, after, setup, before, cleanup, after, cleanupSpec, afterClass

to:

setupSpec, beforeClass, setup, before, cleanup, after, setup, before, cleanup, after, cleanupSpec, afterClass

which should not be a problem in the majority of cases.

At the same time, using JUnit 4’s annotations is discouraged (and considered deprecated), the same using the other elements of JUnit 4 (as `(Class)Rule`s).

Reduce spock-core direct groovy dependencies

spock-core now only depends on groovy.jar. All other Groovy dependencies have been removed, this should make dependency management a bit easier. If you relied on other groovy dependencies transitively, you will need to add them directly.

Upgrade to JUnit 5.6 (and JUnit Platform 1.6)

JUnit Platform 1.6 deprecated methods (from experimental API) in EngineExecutionResults that Spock was using. To keep runtime compatibility with JUnit 5.6 and incoming 5.7 the implementation has been switched to the new methods. As a result, Spock 2.0-M3 cannot work with JUnit 5.5 and lower. The problem might only occur if a project overrides default JUnit Platform version provided by Spock.

New meaning of `>> _`

The meaning of >> _ has changed from "use the default response" to "return a stubbed value" (Docs). The original behavior was only ever documented in the Javadocs and was basically the same to just omitting it. The only use-case was chained responses >> "a" >> _ >> "b", but even here it is clearer to just use null or { callRealMethod() } explicitly. With the new behavior, you can have a Mock or Spy return the same value as a Stub would.

subscriber.receive(_) >> _

Renamed iterationCount token

The token #iterationCount in unroll patterns was renamed to #iterationIndex. If you use it somewhere, you have to manually change it to the new name or the test will fail unless you disabled expression asserting, then you will get an #Error:iterationCount rendering instead.

No access to data variables in data pipes anymore

It is not possible anymore to access any data variable from a data pipe or anything else but a previous data table column in a data table cell. This access was partly possible, but could easily prematurely drain iterators, access data providers sooner as expected, behaved differently depending on the concrete code construct used. All these points are more confusing than necessary. If you want to calculate a data variable from others, you can always use a derived data variable that has full access to all previous data variables and can also call helper methods for more complex logic.

If you switch your tests that are fully green to use Spock 2.0 and get any MissingPropertyExceptions, you are probably hitting this change, you should then change to a derived data variable there instead of a data pipe.

If you for example had:

where:
a << [1, 2]
b << a

what you want instead is:

where:
a << [1, 2]
b = a

Assert unroll expressions by default

The system property spock.assertUnrollExpressions is not supported anymore. Instead the new default behavior is equal to having this property set to true. This means tests that were successful but had an #Error: name rendering will now fail. It can be set back to the old pre Spock 2.0 behaviour by setting unroll { validateExpressions false } in the Spock configuration file.

For extension developers

FeatureInfo#getDataVariables() and FeatureInfo#getParameterNames() used to return the same value, the parameter names, in the order of the method parameters. This can disturb some calculations like method argument determination and so on and is plainly wrong, as some parameters could be injected by extensions like injecting mock objects or test proxies or similar. FeatureInfo#getDataVariables() now only returns the actual data variables and in the order how they are defined in the where block.
Method arguments in MethodInfo now have a value of MethodInfo.MISSING_ARGUMENT if no value was set so far, for example by some extensions or from data variables. If any of these is not replaced by some value, an exception will be thrown at runtime.

Ant support removed

SpecClassFileSelector was removed, which was the only class that required ant. If you are still using spock with ant, then you can just copy the class from the spock source code into your build.

Misc

A new MutableClock utility class to support time related testing, see docs.
Defining interactions on property getters within Mock instantiation closures or with closures works now without the need to explicitly qualify the property access with it.:
```
Foo foo = Stub {
    bar >> 'my stubbed property'
}
```
A sequence of two or more underscores can be used to separate multiple data tables in one where block.
Type casts in conditions are now properly carried over to properly disambiguate method calls. For more information see issue #1022.
Data tables now support any amount of semicolons to separate data table columns as alternative to pipes and double pipes, but cannot be mixed with them in one table:
```
where:
a ; b ;; c
1 ; 2 ;; 3
```

The default unroll pattern changed from the rather generic #featureName[#iterationIndex] to a more fancy version that lists all data variables and their values additionally to the feature name and iteration index. If you prefer to retain the old behaviour, you can set the setting unroll { defaultPattern '#featureName[#iterationIndex]' } in the Spock configuration file and you will get the same result as previously.
If neither a parameter to the @Unroll annotation is given, nor the method name contains a #, now the configuration file setting unroll { defaultPattern } is inspected. If it is set to a non-null string, this value is used as unroll pattern.
IterationInfo now has a property for the iterationIndex and one for a map of data variable names to values. This is typically not interesting for the average user, but might be helpful for authors of Spock extensions.
constructorArgs now properly transport type cast information to the constructor selection, for example to disambiguate multiple candidate constructors:
```
Spy(constructorArgs: [null as String, (Pattern) null])
```
Accessing previous data table columns was broken in some cases, now it should work properly, even cross-table and without being disturbed by previous derived data variables.
The order of parameters in a data-driven feature does no longer have to be identical to the declaration order in the where block. Data variables are now injected by name.
Data driven features do no longer have the requirement that either none or all data variables are declared as parameters and that all parameters are also data variables. Now you can either declare none, some, or all data variables as parameters and also have additional method parameters that are no data variables. Those additional parameters must be provided by some Spock extension though. If they are not set at execution time, an exception will be thrown.
Condition closures used in @Requires, @IgnoreIf and @PendingFeatureIf now also get the context passed as argument, so you can use this, typed as org.spockframework.runtime.extension.builtin.PreconditionContext to enable IDE support like code completion:
```
@IgnoreIf({ PreconditionContext it -> it.os.windows })
def "I'll run everywhere but on Windows"() { ... }
```
Execution with an unsupported Groovy version can be allowed with -Dspock.iKnowWhatImDoing.disableGroovyVersionCheck=true (#1164)
Relax maximum allowed Groovy version in snapshot builds (#1108)
Upgrade Groovy to 2.5.12 (improved Java 14+ support) and 3.0.4 (fixes #1127)
Upgrade JUnit 4 to 4.13 (in spock-junit4)
Upgrade Hamcrest to 2.2 (from 1.3 provided previously by junit4.jar)
Derived data variables (assignments in where blocks) now also support multi-assignment syntax, including ignoring some values with the wildcard expression.
```
(a, b, _, c) = row
```
Multi-variable data pipes now also support nesting.
```
[a, [_, b]] << [
  [1, [5, 1]],
  [2, [5, 2]]
]
```
The condition closures for @IgnoreIf, @Requires and @PendingFeatureIf can now access data variables if applied to a data driven feature. This has further implications that are documented in the respective documentation parts and JavaDocs.

Data driven features are now unrolled by default. @Unroll can still be used to specify a custom naming pattern. A simple @Unroll without argument is not needed anymore except when undoing a spec-level @Rollup annotation or if unrolling by default is disabled, so any simple @Unroll annotations can be removed from existing code. You can verify this by looking at the test count which should not have been changed after you removed the simple @Unroll annotations.
@Rollup can now be used on feature and spec level to explicitly roll up any feature where the reporting of single iterations is not wanted.
The setting unroll { unrollByDefault false } in the Spock configuration file can be set to roll up all features by default if not overwritten by explicit @Unroll annotations and thus reinstate the pre Spock 2.0 behaviour.
Updated OSGI support with using bnd (#1154, #1175)
Fix @PendingFeature logic (#1103)
Do not strip type information from arguments (#1134)
Simplify work-around to get the reference to the current closure (#1131)
Set source position for return statement in data provider method (#1116)
Add Spy(T obj, Closure interactions) (#1115)
Reduce number of Groovy dependencies to just groovy.jar (#1109)
Improve ExceptionUtil.sneakyThrow declaration (#1077)
Print up to 5 last mock invocations for a wrong order error (#1093)
Fix EmptyOrDummyResponse returning mock instance for Object (#1092)
Remove unnecessary reflection for Java 8 types in EmptyOrDummyResponse (#1091)
Update old Issue annotations to point to migrated github issues (#1003)
Test Spock with Java 14 (#1155)

Thanks to all the contributors to this release: Björn Kautler, Marcin Zajączkowski, Raymond Augé, Roman Tretiak, Camilo Jorquera, Shil Sinha

2.0-M2 (2020-02-10)

Groovy-3.0 Support

The main feature of this milestone is support for Groovy 3. To use Spock in your Groovy 3 project just select the spock-\*-2.0-M2 artifact(s) ending with -groovy-3.0.

Note

As Groovy 3 is not backward compatible with Groovy 2, there is a layer of abstraction in Spock to allow to build (and use) the project with both Groovy 2 and 3. As a result, an extra artifact spock-groovy2-compat is (automatically) used in projects with Groovy 2. It is very important to do not mix the spock-*-2.x-groovy-2.5 artifacts with the groovy-*-3.x artifacts on a classpath. This may result in weird runtime errors.

Breaking Changes

Sputnik Runner removed

Although already in 2.0-M1 it wasn’t explicitly mentioned: All enhancements that either extended Sputnik or used it as a delegate runner will not work anymore, e.g, PowerMockRunnerDelegate.

Misc

Add @PendingFeatureIf annotation (Docs)
Fail-fast for invalid Stub interactions, added new validation that catches more invalid usage of Stub
Forbid spying on Spy instances, as this doesn’t work anyway and leads to wrong expectations (#1029)
Update Jvm helper utility to include new Java versions, removed pre 8 versions
Update docs regarding ByteBuddy, cglib, objenesis
Provide compatibility to both JUnit 5.5.2 and 5.6.0

Thanks to all the contributors to this release: Marcin Zajączkowski (Groovy 3 support), Björn Kautler, Ryan Gardner

2.0-M1 (2019-12-31)

This is the first milestone release to version 2.0. This means that we have migrated to the new JUnit Platform and all internal tests pass. We have tried to keep the API as compatible as possible and if you’ve only used the public spock API then there is a high possibility that all you have to do is to update the spock version and configure gradle/maven to use the JUnit Platform.

However, this doesn’t mean that the API is finalized yet, the goal for the first milestone was just to get it running on the new platform. The next milestones will focus on improvements like the much requested parallel execution support.

Please try it out and report any new bugs so that we can fix them for the final 2.0 release.

Breaking Changes

New JUnit Platform

Switch from JUnit 4 to the JUnit Platform. See https://junit.org/junit5/docs/current/user-guide/#running-tests-build on how to configure maven and gradle to use the JUnit Platform.

JUnit 4 Rules are not supported by spock-core anymore, however, there is a new spock-junit4 module that provides best effort support to ease migration.

Misc

Spock now requires at least Java 8
All data-driven test iterations are always reported (unrolled), while @Unroll is not necessary anymore it can still be used to define the name template
@Retry.Mode.FEATURE didn’t work anymore and has been removed
spock-report module has been removed, it was never officially released
The SpockReportingExtension has been disabled until we can integrate it with JUnitPlatform
Removed testing for spring-2.x as it is incompatible
Fix some Javadocs

Special thanks goes to Marc Philipp who helped a lot with the integration of the JUnit Platform.

Thanks to all the contributors to this release: Marcin Zajączkowski, k3v1n0x90

1.3 (2019-03-05)

No functional changes

1.3-RC1 (2019-01-22)

The theme for this release is to increase the information that is provided when an assertion failed.

Potential breaking changes

code argument constraints are treated as implicit assertions

Before this release the code argument constrains worked by returning a boolean result. This was fine if you just wanted to do a simple comparison, but it breaks down if you need to do 5 comparisons. Users also often assumed that it worked like the assertions in then blocks and didn’t add && to chain multiple assertions together, so their constraint ignored all before the next line.

1 * mock.foo( { it.size() > 1
                it[0].length == 2 })

This would only use the length comparison, to make it work you had to add &&. Another problem arises by having more than one comparison inside the constraints, you don’t know which of the 5 comparisons failed. If you just expected one method call you could use an explicit assert as a workaround, but since it immediately breaks, you can’t use it if you want to have multiple different calls to the same mock.

With 1.3 the above code will actually work as intended, and even more important it will give actual feedback what didn’t match.

So what can break?

If you used the code argument constraint as a way of capturing the argument value, then this will most likely not work anymore, since assignments to already declared variables are forbidden in implicit assertion block. If you still need access to the argument, you can use the response generator closure instead.

def extern = null

1 * mock.foo( { extern = it; it.size() > 0 })  // old
1 * mock.foo( { it.size() > 0 }) >> { extern = it[0] } // new

The added benefit of this changes is, that it clearly differentiates the condition from the capture.

Another consequence of the change is, that the empty {} assertion block will now pass instead of fail, since no assertion error is being treated as passing, while it required a true result beforehand.

It is advised, that if you have multiple conditions joined by &&, that you remove it to get individual assertions reports instead of a large joined block.

assertions with explicit messages now include power assertions output.

Given

def a = 1
def b = 2
assert a == b : "Additional message"

Before

a == b

Additional message

Now

a == b
| |  |
1 |  2
  false

Additional message

If you relied on this behavior to hide some output, or to prevent a stack overflow due to a self referencing data structure, then you need to move the condition into a separate method that just returns the boolean result.

What’s New In This release

Add implicit assertions for CodeArgument constraints (#956)
Add power assertion output to asserts with explicit message (#928)
Add support for mixed named and positional arguments in mocks (#919)
Add NamedParam support for groovy-2.5 with backport to 2.4 (#921)
Add special rendering for Set comparisons (#925)
Add identity hash code to type hints in comparison failures if they are identical
Fix erroneous regex where an optional colon was defined instead of a non-capturing group (#931)
Improve CodeArgumentConstraint by supporting assertions (#918)
Improve IDE type inference in MockingApi (#920)
Improve reporting of TooFewInvocationsError (#912)
Improve render class loader for classes in comparison failures (#932)
Improve record class literal values to display FQCN in comparison failures (#935)
Improve filter Java 9+ reflection stack frames
Improve show stacktrace of throwables in comparison failure result
Improve use canonical class name in comparison failure results if present
Improve render otherwise irrelevant expressions if they get a type hint in comparison failure (#936)
Fix do not convert implicit "this" expression like when calling the constructor of a non-static inner class (#930)
Fix class expression recording when there are comments with dots in the same line (#937)

Thanks to all the contributors to this release: Björn Kautler, Marc Philipp, Marcin Zajączkowski, Martin Vseticka, Michael Kutz, Kacper Bublik

1.2 (2018-09-23)

Breaking Changes: Spock 1.2 drops support for Java 6, Groovy 2.0 and Groovy 2.3

What’s New In This release

Add support for Java 11+ (#895, #902, #903)
Add Groovy 2.5.0 Variant for better Java 10+ Support
Add @SpringBean and @SpringSpy inspired by @MockBean, Also add @StubBeans (Docs)
Add @UnwrapAopProxy to make automatically unwrap SpringAopProxies
Add @AutoAttach extension (Docs)
Add @Retry extension (Docs)
Add flag to UnrollNameProvider to assert unroll expressions (set the system property spock.assertUnrollExpressions to true) (#767)
Add automatic module name descriptors for Java 9
Add configurable condition to @Retry extension to allow for customizing when retries should be attempted (Docs)
Improve @PendingFeature to now have an optional reason attribute (#907)
Improve @Retry to be declarable on a spec class which will apply it to all feature methods in that class and subclasses (Docs)
Improve StepwiseExtension mark only subsequent features as skipped in case of failure (#893)
Improve in assertions Spock now uses DefaultGroovyMethods.dump instead of toString if a class doesn’t override the default Object.toString.
Improve verifyAll can now also have a target same as with
Improve static type hints for verifyAll and with
Improve reporting of exceptions during cleanup, they are now properly reported as suppressed exceptions instead of hiding the real exception
Improve default responses for stubs, Java 8 types like Optional and Streams now return empty, CompletableFuture completes with null result
Improve support for builder pattern, stubs now return themselves if the return type matches the type of the stub
Improve tapestry support with by supporting @ImportModule
Improve constructorArgs for spies can now accept a map directly without the need to wrap it in a list
Improve Guice Module now automatically attaches detached mocks
Improve unmatched mock messages by using dump instead of inspect for classes which don’t provide a custom toString
Improve spying on concrete instances to enable partial mocking
Fix use String renderer for Class instances (#909)
Fix mark new Spring extensions as @Beta (#890)
Fix exclude groovy-groovysh from compile dependencies (#882)
Fix Retry.Mode.FEATURE and Retry.Mode.SETUP_FEATURE_CLEANUP to make a test pass if a retry was successful.
Fix issue with @SpringBean mocks throwing InvocationTargetException instead of actual declared exceptions (#878, #887)
Fix void methods with implicit targets failing in with and verifyAll (#886)
Fix SpockAssertionErrors and its subclasses now are properly Serializable
Fix Spring injection of JUnit Rules, due to the changes in 1.1 the rules where initialized before Spring could inject them, this has been fixed by performing the injection earlier in the process
Fix SpringMockTestExecutionListener initializes lazy beans
Fix OSGi Import-Package header
Fix re-declare recorder variables (#783), this caused annotations such as @Slf4j to break Specifications
Fix MissingFieldException in DiffedObjectAsBeanRenderer
Fix problems with nested with and verifyAll method calls
Fix assertion of mock invocation order with nested invocations (#475)
Fix ignore inferred type for Spies on existing instance
General dependency update

Thanks to all the contributors to this release: Marc Philipp, Rob Elliot, jochenberger, Jan Papenbrock, Paul King, Marcin Zajączkowski, mrb-twx, Alexander Kazakov, Serban Iordache, Xavier Fournet, timothy-long, John Osberg, AlexElin, Benjamin Muschko, Andreas Neumann, geoand, Burk Hufnagel, signalw, Martin Vseticka, Tilman Ginzel

1.2-RC3 (2018-09-16)

What’s New In This release

Add support for Java 11+ (#895, #902, #903)
Improve @PendingFeature to now have an optional reason attribute (#907)
Fix use String renderer for Class instances (#909)
Fix mark new Spring extensions as @Beta (#890)
Fix exclude groovy-groovysh from compile dependencies (#882)

Thanks to all the contributors to this release: Marc Philipp, Marcin Zajączkowski, signalw

1.2-RC2 (2018-09-04)

What’s New In This release

Add configurable condition to @Retry extension to allow for customizing when retries should be attempted (Docs)
Fix Retry.Mode.FEATURE and Retry.Mode.SETUP_FEATURE_CLEANUP to make a test pass if a retry was successful.
Improve @Retry to be declarable on a spec class which will apply it to all feature methods in that class and subclasses (Docs)
Improve StepwiseExtension mark only subsequent features as skipped in case of failure (#893)
Fix issue with @SpringBean mocks throwing InvocationTargetException instead of actual declared exceptions (#878, #887)
Fix void methods with implicit targets failing in with and verifyAll (#886)

Thanks to all the contributors to this release: Marc Philipp, Tilman Ginzel, Marcin Zajączkowski, Martin Vseticka

1.2-RC1 (2018-08-14)

Breaking Changes: Spock 1.2 drops support for Java 6, Groovy 2.0 and Groovy 2.3

What’s New In This release

Add Groovy 2.5.0 Variant for better Java 10 Support
Add @SpringBean and @SpringSpy inspired by @MockBean, Also add @StubBeans
Add @UnwrapAopProxy to make automatically unwrap SpringAopProxies
Add flag to UnrollNameProvider to assert unroll expressions (set the system property spock.assertUnrollExpressions to true) #767
Add automatic module name descriptors for Java 9
Add @AutoAttach extension (Docs)
Add @Retry extension (Docs)
Fix SpockAssertionErrors and its subclasses now are properly Serializable
Fix Spring injection of JUnit Rules, due to the changes in 1.1 the rules where initialized before Spring could inject them, this has been fixed by performing the injection earlier in the process
Fix SpringMockTestExecutionListener initializes lazy beans
Fix OSGi Import-Package header
Fix re-declare recorder variables (#783), this caused annotations such as @Slf4j to break Specifications
Fix MissingFieldException in DiffedObjectAsBeanRenderer
Fix problems with nested with and verifyAll method calls
Fix assertion of mock invocation order with nested invocations (#475)
Fix ignore inferred type for Spies on existing instance
Improve in assertions Spock now uses DefaultGroovyMethods.dump instead of toString if a class doesn’t override the default Object.toString.
Improve verifyAll can now also have a target same as with
Improve static type hints for verifyAll and with
Improve reporting of exceptions during cleanup, they are now properly reported as suppressed exceptions instead of hiding the real exception
Improve default responses for stubs, Java 8 types like Optional and Streams now return empty, CompletableFuture completes with null result
Improve support for builder pattern, stubs now return themselves if the return type matches the type of the stub
Improve tapestry support with by supporting @ImportModule
Improve constructorArgs for spies can now accept a map directly without the need to wrap it in a list
Improve Guice Module now automatically attaches detached mocks
Improve unmatched mock messages by using dump instead of inspect for classes which don’t provide a custom toString
Improve spying on concrete instances to enable partial mocking
General dependency update

Thanks to all the contributors to this release: Rob Elliot, jochenberger, Jan Papenbrock, Paul King, Marcin Zajączkowski, mrb-twx, Alexander Kazakov, Serban Iordache, Xavier Fournet, timothy-long, John Osberg, AlexElin, Benjamin Muschko, Andreas Neumann, geoand, Burk Hufnagel

Known Issues

Groovy 2.4.10 introduced a bug that interfered with the way verifyAll works, it has been fixed in 2.4.12

1.1 (2017-05-01)

What’s New In This release

Update docs to include info/examples for Spying instantiated objects
Fix integer overflow that could occur when the OutOfMemoryError protection while comparing huge strings kicked in
Improve rendering for OutOfMemoryError protection

1.1-rc-4 (2017-03-28)

This should be the last rc for 1.1

What’s New In This release

15 merged pull requests
Spies can now be created with an already existing target
Fix for scoped Spring Beans
Fix incompatibility with Spring 2/3 that was introduced in 1.1-rc-1
Fix groovy compatibility
Fix ByteBuddy compatibility
Fix OutOfMemoryError when comparing huge strings
Improve default response for java.util.Optional<T>, will now return empty optional
Improve detection of Spring Boot tests
Improve documentation for global extensions

Thanks to all the contributors to this release: Taylor Wicksell, Rafael Winterhalter, Marcin Zajączkowski, Eduardo Grajeda, Paul King, Andrii, Björn Kautler, Libor Rysavy

Known issues with groovy 2.4.10 which breaks a smoke test, but should have little impact on normal use (#709).

1.1-rc-3 (released 2016-10-17)

Adds compatibility with ByteBuddy as an alternative to cglib for generating mocks and stubs for classes.

1.1-rc-2 (released 2016-08-22)

1.1 should be here soon but in the meantime there’s a new release candidate.

What’s New In This release

Support for the new test annotations in Spring Boot 1.4.
Fixed the integration of JUnit method rules which now correctly happen "outside" the setup / cleanup methods.

Thanks to all the contributors to this release: Jochen Berger, Leonard Brünings, Mariusz Gilewicz, Tomasz Juchniewicz, Gamal Mateo, Tobias Schulte, Florian Wilhelm, Kevin Wittek

1.1-rc-1 (released 2016-06-30)

A number of excellent pull requests have been integrated into the 1.1 stream. Currently some features are incubating. We encourage users to try out these new features and provide feedback so we can finalize the content for a 1.1 release.

What’s New In This release

44 merged pull requests
The verifyAll method can be used to assert multiple boolean expressions without short-circuiting those after a failure. For example:

then:
verifyAll {
  a == b
  b == c
}

Detached mocks via the DetachedMockFactory and SpockMockFactoryBean classes see the Spring Module Docs.
Cells in a data table can refer to the current value for a column to the left.
Spy can be used to create partial mocks for Java 8 interfaces with default methods just as it can for abstract classes.
Improved power assert output when an exception occurs evaluating an assertion.
A new @PendingFeature annotation to distinguish incomplete functionality from features with @Ignore.

Special thanks to all the contributors to this release: Dmitry Andreychuk, Aseem Bansal, Daniel Bechler, Fedor Bobin, Leonard Brünings, Leonard Daume, Marcin Erdmann, Jarl Friis, Søren Berg Glasius, Serban Iordache, Michal Kordas, Pap Lőrinc, Vlad Muresan, Etienne Neveu, Glyn Normington, David Norton, Magnus Palmér, Gus Power, Oliver Reissig, Kevin Wittek and Marcin Zajączkowski

1.0 (released 2015-03-02)

1.0 has arrived! Finally (and some years late) the version number communicates what Spock users have known for ages - that Spock isn’t only useful and fun, but also reliable, mature, and here to stay. So please, go out and tell everyone who hasn’t been assimilated that now is the time to join the party!

A special thanks goes to all our tireless speakers and supporters, only a few of which are listed here: Andres Almiray, Cédric Champeau, David Dawson, Rob Fletcher, Sean Gilligan, Ken Kousen, Guillaume Laforge, NFJS Tour, Graeme Rocher, Baruch Sadogursky, Odin Hole Standal, Howard M. Lewis Ship, Ken Sipe, Venkat Subramaniam, Russel Winder.

What’s New In This Release

17 contributors, 21 resolved issues, 18 merged pull requests, some ongoing work. No ground-breaking new features, but significant improvements and fixes across the board.
Minimum runtime requirements raised to JRE 1.6 and Groovy 2.0.
Improved and restyled reference documentation at https://docs.spockframework.org. Generated with Asciidoctor (what else?).
Maven plugin removed. Just let Maven Surefire run your Spock specs like your JUnit tests (see spock-example project).
Official support for Java 1.8, Groovy 2.3 and Groovy 2.4. Make sure to pick the groovy-2.0 binaries for Groovy 2.0/2.1/2.2, groovy-2.3 binaries for Groovy 2.3, and groovy-2.4 binaries for Groovy 2.4 and higher.
Improved infrastructure to allow for easier community involvement: Switch to GitHub issue tracker, Windows and Linux CI builds, pull requests automatically tested, all development on master branch (bye-bye groovy-x.y branches!).

Other News

Follow our new Twitter account
Try these new third-party extensions
Check out the upcoming Java Testing with Spock book from Manning

What’s Up Next?

With a revamped build/release process and a reforming core team, we hope to release much more frequently from now on. Another big focus will be to better involve the community and their valuable contributions. Last but not least, we are finally shooting for a professional logo and website. Stay tuned for announcements!

Test Long And Prosper,

The Spock Team

Contributors

17 awesome people contributed to this release:

Resolved Issues

21 burning issues were fixed:

Merged Pull Requests

18 hand-crafted pull requests were merged or cherry-picked:

New Third Party Extensions

These awesome extensions have been published or updated:

Ongoing Work

These great features didn’t make it into this release (but hopefully the next!):

0.7 (released 2012-10-08)

Snapshot Repository Moved

Spock snapshots are now available from https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/spockframework/.

New Reference Documentation

The new Spock reference documentation is available at https://docs.spockframework.org. It will gradually replace the documentation at https://wiki.spockframework.org. Each Spock version is documented separately (e.g. https://docs.spockframework.org/en/spock-0.7-groovy-1.8). Documentation for the latest Spock snapshot is at https://docs.spockframework.org/en/latest. As of Spock 0.7, the chapters on Data Driven Testing and Interaction Based Testing are complete.

Improved Mocking Failure Message for `TooManyInvocationsError`

The diagnostic message accompanying a TooManyInvocationsError has been greatly improved. Here is an example:

Too many invocations for:

3 * person.sing(_)   (4 invocations)

Matching invocations (ordered by last occurrence):

2 * person.sing("do")   <-- this triggered the error
1 * person.sing("re")
1 * person.sing("mi")

Reference Documentation

Improved Mocking Failure Message for `TooFewInvocationsError`

The diagnostic message accompanying a TooFewInvocationsError has been greatly improved. Here is an example:

Too few invocations for:

1 * person.sing("fa")   (0 invocations)

Unmatched invocations (ordered by similarity):

1 * person.sing("re")
1 * person.say("fa")
1 * person2.shout("mi")

Reference Documentation

Stubs

Besides mocks, Spock now has explicit support for stubs:

def person = Stub(Person)

A stub is a restricted form of mock object that responds to invocations without ever demanding them. Other than not having a cardinality, a stub’s interactions look just like a mock’s interactions. Using a stub over a mock is an effective way to communicate its role to readers of the specification.

Reference Documentation

Spies

Besides mocks, Spock now has support for spies:

def person = Spy(Person, constructorArgs: ["Fred"])

A spy sits atop a real object, in this example an instance of class Person. All invocations on the spy that don’t match an interaction are delegated to that object. This allows to listen in on and selectively change the behavior of the real object. Furthermore, spies can be used as partial mocks.

Reference Documentation

Declaring Interactions at Mock Creation Time

Interactions can now be declared at mock creation time:

def person = Mock(Person) {
    sing() >> "tra-la-la"
    3 * eat()
}

This feature is particularly attractive for Stubs.

Reference Documentation

Groovy Mocks

Spock now offers specialized mock objects for spec’ing Groovy code:

def mock = GroovyMock(Person)
def stub = GroovyStub(Person)
def spy = GroovySpy(Person)

A Groovy mock automatically implements groovy.lang.GroovyObject. It allows stubbing and mocking of dynamic methods just like for statically declared methods. When a Groovy mock is called from Java rather than Groovy code, it behaves like a regular mock.

Reference Documentation

Global Mocks

A Groovy mock can be made global:

GroovySpy(Person, global: true)

A global mock can only be created for a class type. It effectively replaces all instances of that type and makes them amenable to stubbing and mocking. (You may know this behavior from Groovy’s MockFor and StubFor facilities.) Furthermore, a global mock allows mocking of the type’s constructors and static methods.

Reference Documentation

Grouping Conditions with Same Target Object

Inspired from Groovy’s Object.with method, the Specification.with method allows to group conditions involving the same target object:

def person = new Person(name: "Fred", age: 33, sex: "male")

expect:
with(person) {
    name == "Fred"
    age == 33
    sex == "male"
}

Grouping Interactions with Same Target Object

The with method can also be used for grouping interactions:

def service = Mock(Service)
app.service = service

when:
app.run()

then:
with(service) {
    1 * start()
    1 * act()
    1 * stop()
}

Reference Documentation

Polling Conditions

spock.util.concurrent.PollingConditions joins AsyncConditions and BlockingVariable(s) as another utility for testing asynchronous code:

def person = new Person(name: "Fred", age: 22)
def conditions = new PollingConditions(timeout: 10)

when:
Thread.start {
    sleep(1000)
    person.age = 42
    sleep(5000)
    person.name = "Barney"
}

then:
conditions.within(2) {
    assert person.age == 42
}

conditions.eventually {
    assert person.name == "Barney"
}

Experimental DSL Support for Eclipse

Spock now ships with a DSL descriptor that lets Groovy Eclipse better understand certain parts of Spock’s DSL. The descriptor is automatically detected and activated by the IDE. Here is an example:

// currently need to type variable for the following to work
Person person = new Person(name: "Fred", age: 42)

expect:
with(person) {
    name == "Fred" // editor understands and auto-completes 'name'
    age == 42      // editor understands and auto-completes 'age'
}

Another example:

def person = Stub(Person) {
    getName() >> "Fred" // editor understands and auto-completes 'getName()'
    getAge() >> 42      // editor understands and auto-completes 'getAge()'
}

DSL support is activated for Groovy Eclipse 2.7.1 and higher. If necessary, it can be deactivated in the Groovy Eclipse preferences.

Experimental DSL Support for IntelliJ IDEA

Spock now ships with a DSL descriptor that lets Intellij IDEA better understand certain parts of Spock’s DSL. The descriptor is automatically detected and activated by the IDE. Here is an example:

def person = new Person(name: "Fred", age: 42)

expect:
with(person) {
    name == "Fred" // editor understands and auto-completes 'name'
    age == 42      // editor understands and auto-completes 'age'
}

Another example:

def person = Stub(Person) {
    getName() >> "Fred" // editor understands and auto-completes 'getName()'
    getAge() >> 42      // editor understands and auto-completes 'getAge()'
}

DSL support is activated for IntelliJ IDEA 11.1 and higher.

Splitting up Class Specification

Parts of class spock.lang.Specification were pulled up into two new super classes: spock.lang.MockingApi now contains all mocking-related methods, and org.spockframework.lang.SpecInternals contains internal methods which aren’t meant to be used directly.

Improved Failure Messages for `notThrown` and `noExceptionThrown`

Instead of just passing through exceptions, Specification.notThrown and Specification.noExceptionThrown now fail with messages like:

Expected no exception to be thrown, but got 'java.io.FileNotFoundException'

Caused by: java.io.FileNotFoundException: ...

`HamcrestSupport.expect`

Class spock.util.matcher.HamcrestSupport has a new expect method that makes Hamcrest assertions read better in then-blocks:

when:
def x = computeValue()

then:
expect x, closeTo(42, 0.01)

@Beta

Recently introduced classes and methods may be annotated with @Beta, as a sign that they may still undergo incompatible changes. This gives us a chance to incorporate valuable feedback from our users. (Yes, we need your feedback!) Typically, a @Beta annotation is removed within one or two releases.

Fixed Issues

See the issue tracker for a list of fixed issues.

0.6 (released 2012-05-02)

Mocking Improvements

The mocking framework now provides better diagnostic messages in some cases.

Multiple result declarations can be chained. The following causes method bar to throw an IOException when first called, return the numbers one, two, and three on the next calls, and throw a RuntimeException for all subsequent calls:

foo.bar() >> { throw new IOException() } >>> [1, 2, 3] >> { throw new RuntimeException() }

It’s now possible to match any argument list (including the empty list) with foo.bar(*_).

Method arguments can now be constrained with Hamcrest matchers:

import static spock.util.matcher.HamcrestMatchers.closeTo

...

1 * foo.bar(closeTo(42, 0.001))

Extended JUnit Rules Support

In addition to rules implementing org.junit.rules.MethodRule (which has been deprecated in JUnit 4.9), Spock now also supports rules implementing the new org.junit.rules.TestRule interface. Also supported is the new @ClassRule annotation. Rule declarations are now verified and can leave off the initialization part. I that case Spock will automatically initialize the rule by calling the default constructor. The @TestName rule, and rules in general, now honor the @Unroll annotation and any defined naming pattern.

See Issue 240 for a known limitation with Spock’s TestRule support.

Condition Rendering Improvements

When two objects are compared with the == operator, they are unequal, but their string representations are the same, Spock will now print the objects' types:

enteredNumber == 42
|             |
|             false
42 (java.lang.String)

JUnit Fixture Annotations

Fixture methods can now be declared with JUnit’s @Before, @After, @BeforeClass, and @AfterClass annotations, as an addition or alternative to Spock’s own fixture methods. This was particularly needed for Grails 2.0 support.

Tapestry 5.3 Support

Thanks to a contribution from Howard Lewis Ship, the Tapestry module is now compatible with Tapestry 5.3. Older 5.x versions are still supported.

IBM JDK Support

Spock now runs fine on IBM JDKs, working around a bug in the IBM JDK’s verifier.

Improved JUnit Compatibility

org.junit.internal.AssumptionViolatedException is now recognized and handled as known from JUnit. @Unrolled methods no longer cause "yellow" nodes in IDEs.

Improved `@Unroll`

The @Unroll naming pattern can now be provided in the method name, instead of as an argument to the annotation:

@Unroll
def "maximum of #a and #b is #c"() {
    expect:
    Math.max(a, b) == c

    where:
    a | b | c
    1 | 2 | 2
}

The naming pattern now supports property access and zero-arg method calls:

@Unroll
def "#person.name.toUpperCase() is #person.age years old"() { ... }

The @Unroll annotation can now be applied to a spec class. In this case, all data-driven feature methods in the class will be unrolled.

Improved `@Timeout`

The @Timeout annotation can now be applied to a spec class. In this case, the timeout applies to all feature methods (individually) that aren’t already annotated with @Timeout. Timed methods are now executed on the regular test framework thread. This can be important for tests that rely on thread-local state (like Grails integration tests). Also the interruption behavior has been improved, to increase the chance that a timeout can be enforced.

The failure exception that is thrown when a timeout occurs now contains the stacktrace of test execution, allowing you to see where the test was “stuck” or how far it got in the allocated time.

Improved Data Table Syntax

Table cells can now be separated with double pipes. This can be used to visually set apart expected outputs from provided inputs:

...
where:
a | b || sum
1 | 2 || 3
3 | 1 || 4

Groovy 1.8/2.0 Support

Spock 0.6 ships in three variants for Groovy 1.7, 1.8, and 2.0. Make sure to pick the right version - for example, for Groovy 1.8 you need to use spock-core-0.6-groovy-1.8 (likewise for all other modules). The Groovy 2.0 variant is based on Groovy 2.0-beta-3-SNAPSHOT and only available from https://m2repo.spockframework.org. The Groovy 1.7 and 1.8 variants are also available from Maven Central. The next version of Spock will no longer support Groovy 1.7.

Grails 2.0 Support

Spock’s Grails plugin was split off into a separate project and now lives at https://github.spockframework.org/spock-grails. The plugin supports both Grails 1.3 and 2.0.

The Spock Grails plugin supports all of the new Grails 2.0 test mixins, effectively deprecating the existing unit testing classes (e.g. UnitSpec). For integration testing, IntegrationSpec must still be used.

IntelliJ IDEA Integration

The folks from JetBrains have added a few handy features around data tables. Data tables will now be layed out automatically when reformatting code. Data variables are no longer shown as "unknown" and have their types inferred from the values in the table (!).

GitHub Repository

All source code has moved to https://github.spockframework.org/. The Grails Spock plugin, Spock Example project, and Spock Web Console now have their own GitHub projects. Also available are slides and code for various Spock presentations (such as this one).

Gradle Build

Spock is now exclusively built with Gradle. Building Spock yourself is as easy as cloning the Github repo and executing gradlew build. No build tool installation is required; the only prerequisite for building Spock is a JDK installation (1.5 or higher).

Fixed Issues

See the issue tracker for a list of fixed issues.

Migration Guide

This page explains incompatible changes between successive versions and provides suggestions on how to deal with them.

2.0

Note	This section only touches on the breaking changes, see the Release Notes for a full list of changes and new features.

Spock 2.0 aims to be as compatible as possible for existing code bases, while making the necessary changes to stay a modern test framework.

The biggest change is the switch from being a JUnit 4 Runner to a full-fledged JUnit Platform TestEngine. That means, that you’ll have to configure your build to use the JUnit Platform to execute tests.

See the JUnit Platform Guide on how to configure your build to use the JUnit Platform.

JUnit 4 support

Support for JUnit 4 has been removed from spock-core, you can use the new spock-junit4 module if you still need JUnit 4 features, such as @Rule.

You can replace the TemporaryFolder rule with the new built-in @TempDir extension.

Spock 2.0 also removed the Sputnik runner, so if you have used PowerMockRunnerDelegate or other things that relied on the runner, you’ll have to find other solutions. Take a look at Third-Party-Extensions for solutions.

Reduce spock-core direct groovy dependencies

Unroll changes

Data driven features are now unrolled by default. @Unroll can still be used to specify a custom naming pattern. A simple @Unroll without argument is not needed anymore except when undoing a spec-level @Rollup annotation or if unrolling by default is disabled, so any simple @Unroll annotations can be removed from existing code. You can verify this by looking at the test count which should not have been changed after you removed the simple @Unroll annotations.
@Rollup can now be used on feature and spec level to explicitly roll up any feature where the reporting of single iterations is not wanted.
The setting unroll { unrollByDefault false } in the Spock configuration file can be set to roll up all features by default if not overwritten by explicit @Unroll annotations and thus reinstate the pre Spock 2.0 behaviour.

The default unroll pattern changed from the rather generic #featureName[#iterationIndex] to a more fancy version that lists all data variables and their values additionally to the feature name and iteration index. If you prefer to retain the old behaviour, you can set the setting unroll { defaultPattern '#featureName[#iterationIndex]' } in the Spock configuration file and you will get the same result as previously.

Assert unroll expressions by default

Renamed iterationCount token

New meaning of `>> _`

No access to data variables in data pipes anymore

If you for example had:

where:
a << [1, 2]
b << a

what you want instead is:

where:
a << [1, 2]
b = a

Ant support removed

Other Breaking changes

Add new displayName via INameable for SpecInfo, FeatureInfo, and IterationInfo. This field can be set via extensions to change the reported name. The existing iteration NameProvider now also sets the displayName instead of the name. Modifying the name instead of displayName is now considered deprecated for extensions. #1236
Spock now requires at least Java 8
@Retry.Mode.FEATURE didn’t work anymore and has been removed
spock-report module has been removed, it was never officially released :leveloffset: -1
The ReportLogExtension vestiges were removed. As this extension was mostly used for an unreleased Spock module, this won’t affect many users. If you are using a Spock Configuration File with a report section, then you must delete everything from this section except for issueNamePrefix and issueUrlPrefix. These two properties are still supported and used by the @Issue extension.

1.0

Specs, Spec base classes and third-party extensions may have be recompiled in order to work with Spock 1.0.

JRE 1.5 and Groovy versions below 2.0 are no longer supported.

Make sure to pick the right binaries for your Groovy version of choice: groovy-2.0 for Groovy 2.0/2.1/2.2, groovy-2.3 for Groovy 2.3, and groovy-2.4 for Groovy 2.4 and higher. Spock won’t let you run with a "wrong" version.

No known source incompatible changes.

0.7

Client code must be recompiled in order to work with Spock 0.7. This includes third-party Spock extensions and base classes.

No known source incompatible changes.

0.6

Class initialization order

Note	This only affects cases where one specification class inherits from another one.

Given these specifications:

class Base extends Specification {
    def base1 = "base1"
    def base2

    def setup() { base2 = "base2" }
}

class Derived extends Base {
    def derived1 = "derived1"
    def derived2

    def setup() { derived2 = "derived2" }
}

In 0.5, above assignments happened in the order base1, base2, derived1, derived2. In other words, field initializers were executed right before the setup method in the same class. In 0.6, assignments happen in the order base1, derived1, base2, derived2. This is a more conventional order that solves a few problems that users faced with the previous behavior, and also allows us to support JUnit’s new TestRule. As a result of this change, the following will no longer work:

class Base extends Specification {
    def base

    def setup() { base = "base" }
}

class Derived extends Base {
    def derived = base + "derived" // base is not yet set
}

To overcome this problem, you can either use a field initializer for base, or move the assignment of derived into a setup method.

`@Unroll` naming pattern syntax

Note	This is not a change from 0.5, but a change compared to 0.6-SNAPSHOT.

Note	This only affects the Groovy 1.8 and 2.0 variants.

In 0.5, the naming pattern was string based:

@Unroll("maximum of #a and #b is #c")
def "maximum of two numbers"() {
    expect:
    Math.max(a, b) == c

    where:
    a | b | c
    1 | 2 | 2
}

In 0.6-SNAPSHOT, this was changed to a closure returning a GString:

@Unroll({"maximum of $a and $b is $c"})
def "maximum of two numbers"() { ... }

For various reasons, the new syntax didn’t work out as we had hoped, and eventually we decided to go back to the string based syntax. See Improved @Unroll for recent improvements to that syntax.

Hamcrest matcher syntax

Note	This only affects users moving from the Groovy 1.7 to the 1.8 or 2.0 variant.

Spock offers a very neat syntax for using Hamcrest matchers:

import static spock.util.matcher.HamcrestMatchers.closeTo

...

expect:
answer closeTo(42, 0.001)

Due to changes made between Groovy 1.7 and 1.8, this syntax no longer works in as many cases as it did before. For example, the following will no longer work:

expect:
object.getAnswer() closeTo(42, 0.001)

To avoid such problems, use HamcrestSupport.that:

import static spock.util.matcher.HamcrestSupport.that

...

expect:
that answer, closeTo(42, 0.001)

A future version of Spock will likely remove the former syntax and strengthen the latter one.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

What are Spock’s optional dependencies used for?

Spock runs fine without optional dependencies, hence the term optional. So what are they used for?

Objenesis (artifact org.objenesis:objenesis) is required for mocking classes without default constructors.
Either ByteBuddy (artifact net.bytebuddy:byte-buddy) or CGLIB (artifact cglib:cglib-nodep) are required for mocking classes and not just interfaces.

Why are there two options (ByteBuddy vs CGLIB) for mocking classes?

The main reason is backwards compatibility. CGLIB came first historically, ByteBuddy was added later. Both libraries basically provide identical features from a Spock user’s perspective.

If you are starting with Spock now, we recommend ByteBuddy as our preferred choice.

CGLIB is in legacy support mode, we will support it as long as the maintenance effort is relatively low. So you may continue to use CGLIB for now if e.g. your tests use it in another context already. If you have no compelling reasons to avoid ByteBuddy, you can just switch from CGLIB to ByteBuddy in an existing project. Your tests should continue to run like before.

Known Issues

Usage of `final` in a feature method with `cleanup` #1017

You might run into issues if you use final in your Specification. Groovy 2.5 introduced a final checker which broke previously compiling code.

tl;dr: Do not use final inside of features if you get compile errors.

Users combining final and @CompileStatic or final and Spock may see errors from the final variable analyzer. Work is underway to resolve those error messages. You may need to temporarily remove the final modifier in the meantime.

— Groovy 2.5 Release Notes

class Broken extends Specification {
    def "test"() {
        final value = 'hello'

        expect:
        value.size() > 3

        cleanup:
        clean value
    }

    def clean(v) {}
}

Will fail with something like.

> Task :compileTestGroovy FAILED
startup failed:
/Users/acme/projects/spock-tests/src/test/groovy/Broken.groovy: 11: The variable [value] may be uninitialized
. At [11:15]  @ line 11, column 15.
           clean value

This is due to how Spock implements cleanup, by wrapping the whole body in a try-finally block during the AST transformation. If you look at the compiled code you can see how it was transformed

try {
    java.lang.Object value                                       // (1)
    java.lang.Throwable $spock_feature_throwable
    try {
        value = 'hello'                                          // (2)
        try {
            org.spockframework.runtime.SpockRuntime.verifyCondition($spock_errorCollector, $spock_valueRecorder.reset(), 'value.size() > 3', 8, 9, null, $spock_valueRecorder.record($spock_valueRecorder.startRecordingValue(5), $spock_valueRecorder.record($spock_valueRecorder.startRecordingValue(3), $spock_valueRecorder.record($spock_valueRecorder.startRecordingValue(0), value).$spock_valueRecorder.record($spock_valueRecorder.startRecordingValue(1), 'size')()) > $spock_valueRecorder.record($spock_valueRecorder.startRecordingValue(4), 3)))
        }
        catch (java.lang.Throwable throwable) {
            org.spockframework.runtime.SpockRuntime.conditionFailedWithException($spock_errorCollector, $spock_valueRecorder, 'value.size() > 3', 8, 9, null, throwable)}
        finally {
        }
    }
    catch (java.lang.Throwable $spock_tmp_throwable) {
        $spock_feature_throwable = $spock_tmp_throwable
        throw $spock_tmp_throwable
    }
    finally {
        try {
            this.clean(value)                                   // (3)
        }
        catch (java.lang.Throwable $spock_tmp_throwable) {
            if ( $spock_feature_throwable != null) {
                $spock_feature_throwable.addSuppressed($spock_tmp_throwable)
            } else {
                throw $spock_tmp_throwable
            }
        }
        finally {
        }
    }
    this.getSpecificationContext().getMockController().leaveScope()
}
finally {
    $spock_errorCollector.validateCollectedErrors()
}

Here it moved the variable declaration outside of the try-finally block
Here it tries to initialize the field
Here it is passed to cleanup

The catch-22 is that the variable must be declared outside of the try-finally block, to be available in the finally, but for the variable initialization to be covered by the cleanup it must be initialized inside the try block. This works fine for normal variables, but final variable can only be initialized when they are declared.

Using Traits with Specifications

Traits on Specifications are not supported by Spock, some use-cases might work while others don’t. This is due to how groovy implements traits and AST transformations.

Traits are not officially compatible with AST transformations. Some of them, like @CompileStatic will be applied on the trait itself (not on implementing classes), while others will apply on both the implementing class and the trait. There is absolutely no guarantee that an AST transformation will run on a trait as it does on a regular class, so use it at your own risk!

— Groovy Docs

Groovy version compatibility

By default, Spock can only be used with the Groovy version it was compiled with. It means that Spock 2.0-groovy-2.5 can only executed with Groovy 2.5.x, 2.0-groovy-3.0 with 3.0.x, etc. That restriction was introduced to help users find an appropriate Groovy variant and limit number of reported invalid issues caused by the incompatibilities between the major Groovy versions.

However, occasionally it might be useful to be able to play with the next (officially unsupported) Groovy version, especially that usually, in the majority of cases, it should just work fine. Starting with Groovy 2.0 that restriction has been relaxed in the Spock SNAPSHOT versions. In addition, the early adopters can implicitly disable that check - also in the production versions - providing the system property -Dspock.iKnowWhatImDoing.disableGroovyVersionCheck=true. Please bear in mind, however, that it is completely unsupported and might lead to some unexpected errors.

1. The idea behind allowing method parameters is to enable better IDE support. However, recent versions of IntelliJ IDEA recognize data variables automatically, and even infer their types from the values contained in the data table.

2. For example, a feature method could use data variables in its given: block, but not in any conditions.

3. For additional ways to create mock objects, see Other Kinds of Mock Objects and A la Carte Mocks.

4. The subscriber variable cannot be referenced from the closure because it is being declared as part of the same statement.

5. The destructuring semantics for closure arguments come straight from Groovy.

6. You may know this behavior from Groovy’s MockFor and StubFor facilities.

7. Because mock configurations are immutable, the interface contains just the properties' getters.